MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > Why do we say a pair of jeans to mean on...

Why do we say a pair of jeans to mean one pant?


Why do we say a pair of jeans to mean one pant? Why doesn't a pair of jeans mean two pants? Wtf is wrong with English?

reply

A pair of jeans always means a pair of pants, never one pant.

reply

Why isn't it pant instead of pants then?

reply

Maybe because they come in pairs, two pant legs make a pair of pants like two scissor kicks make a pair of scissors.

I don't know. Languages are silly.

reply

Scissor kick? Thats neat, didn't know what the two sides were called.

reply

Lol. A scissor kick is a badass martial arts move, popularly done by a femme fatale character in movies, e.g. Black Widow or Michelle Yeoh. Don't know why I wrote that. I would blame autocorrect, but I don't use one right now. Weird.

reply

Ah, why didn't I notice that? LOL

reply

Watching too much kungfu flicks as a child really shaped my brain.

reply

The pant is basically the leg covering, so two legs equals pants. The rest is there to hold the pants up.

It probably evolved from chaps that were individual pant legs, or something like that.

reply

Oh and a good comparison is a pair of glasses, referring to the glass instead of the whole item.

reply

HA! I get it all now! Not much to get if you think it over for a few moments.
Never the less, you are one smart cookie, Frogarama!

reply

Also, shorts come from the term short pants.

reply

People in the future probably would call yoga pants yogas.

reply

Yep, I agree.

reply

Apparently, centuries ago, pantaloons (pants) were separate articles, one for each leg, joined together at the waist by a belt. Eventually they became one piece of clothing but the "pair of" stuck.

Other examples of pairs: scissors, tweezers, shears, pliers, eyeglasses, binoculars (developed from putting two telescopes together - and since "bi" already denotes two, really makes no sense), shorts, panties, handcuffs, headphones.

reply

But why a pantyhose and not a pair of pantyhoses (or pantyhosen)?

reply

"Hose" is already plural there actually. It's a different term from like a garden hose.

reply

Isn't the plural of hose (the men's tights wore by Robin Hood) hosen?

reply

Hosen is archaic, as you see here, hose is plural:

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/hose

reply

Fair enough, but then there's the word "lederhosen" in English.

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/lederhosen

reply

Yeah but it's still a German word, just like how "rendezvous" is in the English dictionary but it's French.

reply

I still hope for "pantyhosen" to be introduced to English. It's so masculine sounding! Almost inviting for men to wear them.

It's like a kilt. The macho version of a skirt.

reply

Mates...i have to ask this....are you drunk or something!?

reply

Bros before pantyhose

reply

I have no idea what you talking about...truly...

reply

[deleted]

I thought i was alone....i still don't understand...

reply

I wouldn't pretend to try to answer the question, except to say it's because English is nuanced. It's also extremely hard to learn for non-speakers for this very reason, by the way. I mean, "Feb-ru-ary," what in the holy hell is that?!! I highly recommend reading "The Mother Tongue" by Bill Bryson if some of the backwards nuances and idiosyncrasies of the English language are of any interest to you whatsoever.

reply