MovieChat Forums > Lauren Holly Discussion > Why the ghost-white photos?

Why the ghost-white photos?

posted 10 years ago by lulupalooza
3 replies | jump to latest

I've noticed a surge of over-exposed photography that renders Lauren pasty-looking and even more unrecognizable. Perhaps it's another way to mask aging, but with that comes the masking of celebrity. As someone asked recently "That's Lauren Holly?" Well...it beats the surgical knife, I guess.

I wish so many female celebrities didn't feel the pressure to have drastic facelifts and overly paralyzed faces. It would be great if they'd just stay true to their natural beauty. Like one poster pointed out: we don't expect older celebrities to look 20-something anymore.

Talent will always trump wrinkles. :)

"Don't get chumpatized!" - The King of Kong: A Fistful of Quarters (2007)

[–] jnathan 10 years ago

I noticed the same thing, she does look awfully pasty.

My vote history: http://us.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=9354248

[–] Ltcwheatex 10 years ago

I am pretty sure she had work done. She looks TOTALLY different, even when you pull the pasty whites and just view her screenshots. She looked to be in her 40's in NCIS. Now she looks younger and like another woman.
They did a good job. So I guess that means she'll get more.

[–] Crimson72 9 years ago

She is naturally fair skinned and has chosen to leave the tanning and the spray tans alone.Which looks a lot better then the over tanned and over bronzed look.