It seems hypocritical that he wouldn't do a love scene in "high crimes" with Ashley Judd, citing his religion, yet in "angel eyes" there are some pretty graphic scenes with Jennifer Lopez.
This message has been deleted by an administrator
shareThis message has been deleted by the poster
shareThis message has been deleted by an administrator
shareUmm it's not like you think actually, even in ANGEL EYES he refused to do a graphic scene with JLO and he wanted them to both wear underwear. However I believe, that In HIGH CRIMES the producer probably wanted a much more graphic scene, which Jim refused, that's why there isn't much loving on camera lol.
shareJim asked that J-Lo not be naked in the role so she wore some sort of spandex underwear that she could cover herself with during the love scenes. Notice when they are together that Jim's arm is 'strategically' in position to hide her spandex during the scene...
It is well documented that Jim refuses to have a naked woman on or near his body. This was also documented for the Count of Monte Cristo too.....cant help but admire that!
Some people aren't comfortable with having naked people in front of them or near them. Caviezel wanted to be respectful to his wife and to his faith. He didn't annihilate JLo for her nudity or had her flogged 300 times. That would have been put in the wacko Jesusfreak category.
Yes, the man could have picked a different occupation that doesn't require "edgy material" such as undressing but he shouldn't have to leave his morals at the door for some movie.
Perry: "You, stop multiplying!"
That sounds believable. Judd has a reputation for being obnoxious to everyone around her.
Send lawyers,guns and money/The *beep* has hit the fan
Ashley is a fan of the dirty blue cheating machine (UK). That's why, haha.
share