MovieChat Forums > Joseph Fiennes Discussion > a true rarity - a bad british actor

a true rarity - a bad british actor


At least he can say he is unique.



reply

This message has been deleted by the poster

reply

Aww. That's not very nice. Not that I necessarily disagree...

Before me, you rightly tremble.

reply

He is ok, nothing special unlike his older brother.

There are a lot of bad British actors, some of them doing rather well in LA. Julian Sands springs to mind.

Its that man again!!

reply

I think he is good, but I'm gonna have to admit his brother is much better than him (acting-wise) but he still is talented..


"People are afraid to merge." -- Bret Easton Ellis

reply

i dont think he is a bad actor, its just that he hasnt been lucky with the roles he is choosing.

if you wnat to talk about bad british actors id name Robert Pattinson, Daniel Radiclif and Rupert Grint.

reply

Oh, I don't know. He was the most enigmatic Merlin I've seen in Camelot. He was one of the two characters that carried the show.

reply

I just found out that the Monsignor on American Horror Story is him--I didn't recognize him--have seen him before--none of his performances were memorable to me. I looked him up because I find his performance on this show annoying. I usually only write positive things on this board but since someone else started this thread...!

reply

I wouldn't say he's a "bad" actor. Almost anyone who is compared to Ralph would be considered a lesser actor! And just think, Joseph gets compared to his older brother ALL. THE. TIME. It's truly not fair. I think Joseph needs a different agent, possibly. He could be better in the right roles. I thought he was great in Elizabeth, Shakespeare in Love, and Camelot. He needs more roles like those.

reply