I more or less tossed that out there (Davern being the one "whodiddit") as something of a joke, but to be honest, I *have* wondered sometimes about this guy.
Davern apparently in his post-captaining days has been a troubled man, with something of a history of alcoholism and possible mental disorders (at least this is what I've read, and I'm well aware that you have to take most of what you read in the popular media with a very large grain of salt); I've also read words to the effect that some of his own family have speculated that he may suffer from something along the lines of undiagnosed Asperger's Syndrome, though again, you have to be cautious in taking things like this as statements of fact. It is known that Wagner apparently went out of his way to try and help Davern through some of his rockier times, which has turned out pretty ironically for Wagner, to say the least. And of course many Nat Wood 'fans' imply that Wagner was doing so in an effort to keep Davern quiet, which IMO is nonsense, but whatever.
It does lend some credence to the idea that Davern may be an alcoholic or possibly mentally disturbed in some manner that he'd try to do what you point out--sell a book which seemingly *could* wind up implicating him in what happened that night. I could only guess that he's either off his nut enough not to have considered possible ramifications, or--more likely--has been advised that there's probably no serious likelihood that at this late date anything would change as a result of the case being reopened (which it seems more than likely it won't).
He may simply be in dire enough financial straits that he feels it's worth the risk. (This theory would also shoot down the idea that Wagner was paying Davern 'hush money', since if that were so one would think Wagner would certainly continue to pay out any type of blackmail rather than risk having a supposedly 'eyewitness account of a murder' be released to the police and general public.) Best guess is that Davern simply thinks it's somehow okay to revive the case long enough for him to hopefully pick up more sales on a reissue of the book, which didn't earn much when it was initially released.
He apparently has reason to think there's no danger to himself personally to do this, or maybe just isn't capable of apprehending any possible consequences to himself as a result. If he actually *is* mentally disordered in some way, either organically or through substance abuse--or a combination, perhaps, of both--it'd be difficult to predict with any accuracy just *what* he might be thinking or *what* might have motivated his actions in all this.
Don't they say that "the criminal always returns to the scene of his crime"? Could this book be figuratively a case of Dennis Davern doing just that?
reply
share