MovieChat Forums > Jolene Blalock Discussion > Starship Troopers 3?!

Starship Troopers 3?!

posted 17 years ago by jcreed01
9 replies | jump to latest

I saw Troopers 1 and let's just say it was nearly 2 hours of my life that I'll never get back! Nothing like Heinlein's classic book, more like a rejected pilot for a proposed series on the old UPN. Never knew there was a sequel- my guess it was direct to video. Troopers 3 looks like direct to DVD as well. One of Jolene's post-Enterprise interviews said she would avoid sci-fi flicks so as not to be typecast...must be a hell of a script to lure her back. I doubt it, she probably needs the work.

[–] n/a

This message has been deleted by the poster

[–] giulene 17 years ago

i'm agree, however ST3 budget is $ 20 million I doubt it is direct to DVD, what do you think about? Her husband is filthy rich but i think she would be financially indipendent.

[–] jcreed01 17 years ago

Filthy rich probably means hubby has a prenuptial agreement. Don't want to speculate on Jolene's personal financial situation; I should have wrote WANTS to work instead of NEEDS to work. Acting is her career and she needs to keep her face out there even if its Troopers 3.

[–] giulene 17 years ago

i totally agree.

[–] intimidate38 17 years ago

I agree it is going to the theater. Unlike part 2 this is a follow up to the first film involving Casper Van Dien's character Rico.

[–] efen 16 years ago

Well, when one is not getting much work one shouldn't complain nor be picky. Taking a crappy role in ST3 is better than starving or stripping for money.

[–] roska-posti 16 years ago

It was a bad movie with bad computer effects. The original Starship Troopers is still the best and a very good movie.

I wouldn't have watched it to the end if there wasn't Jolene in it.

Lexa is cute!

[–] daniel-garrett 16 years ago

Blalock looked like she'd had serious work done for this. Her botox was off the scale.