Post deleted


This message has been deleted by the poster

reply

This message has been deleted by the poster

reply

This message has been deleted by an administrator

reply

No, she looks really nice. Don't be mean!

reply

I don't think she looks any different than normal, well except the hairstyle is new for the Ashes to Ashes series. She is 33, how old should she look? I did read she had flu very recently (Dean Andrews stupidly twittered that fact, bet she was pleased at him!) Well if I looked like that after having flu I would be quite pleased.

reply

Do you know if she smokes?

Also, I think that severe hairstyle kind of makes her look older than she is.


...rolling downhill like a snowball headed for hell...

reply

I don't think she looks old - if anything she looks a bit stressed out. Possibly from having a camera shoved in her face.

reply

Don't think she looks old in the slightest. A little tired perhaps. As others have said, she was suffering with flu at the time...(ahh the delights of Twitter). Having a pap's camera flash right in your face doesn't make for the most flattering of photos anyway, but she still manages to look entirely gorgeous. If you look at other very recent pics, like those at the Tv Choice/Crimethriller Awards and the Ashes onset photos, she looks very young, very beautiful...I could go on....

reply

I think she looks great, but I just didn't care for that hairstyle in Series 3 - Its just not flattering and seemed, well, kind of goofy. But maybe that was to stress the stark aspect of her being so out of place in 1983 ...

Other than that, I do like her as an actress and am waiting for the series final next week!
And did anyone else comment on how the cop from Manchester (Litton?) looked a lot like Harvey Keitel? Interesting homage, yes?

reply