What's so funny about the "church"s defense...
I love how when someone leaves $cientology, the "church" always describe the defectors as being these lying, thieving monsters...who are lifelong products of their own group!!!
For example, Ms. Remini is suddenly deemed by $cientology to be a washed up, desperate, bitter, pathological liar....yet apparently one who spent millions of dollars and decades of her life devoted to $cientology training.
WHY do the $cientologists think these inflated criticisms of former members make their training/"faith"/product look good, AT ALL???
It's not terribly well thought out...
.