MovieChat Forums > Donald Trump Discussion > The Trump Saga: Now with love child

The Trump Saga: Now with love child

posted 6 years ago by [deleted]
17 replies | jump to latest

Dino Sajudin, the former doorman for Trump Tower released the following statement today:

“Today I awoke to learn that a confidential agreement that I had with AMI (The National Enquirer) with regard to a story about President Trump was leaked to the press. I can confirm that while working at Trump World Tower I was instructed not to criticize President Trump’s former housekeeper due to a prior relationship she had with President Trump which produced a child.”

Just read the below article on this and the woman is completely denying the affair and her husband is saying this has put their family in potential harm's way.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-allegedly-had-a-love-child-with-ex-employee-former-doorman-says/ar-AAvNUmL

[–] [deleted] 6 years ago

It was only a matter of time before something such as this would surface. If - like Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal's stories - is not true, why in the world would these false accusers keep being paid off with thousands of dollars in hush money and then made to sign NDAs with stiff penalties?

I guess there's a whole industry out there where you can make extra money by being a T-rump 'false' accuser? I mean just shop a story to the National Enquirer which you made up on your ride to the office which you know has no merit, and you leave the office with an additional annual income? And if you threaten to shop the story to network news, his lawyer comes in and pays you a bonus?

I guess T-rump is single-handly helping the American economy.

[–] NorrinRad (5059) 6 years ago

There is no love-child but the greater scandal is who really is paying the dollars to squelch, bury, hush, hide, deny the stories?

Forget if whether the stories are True or False and continue to follow the money trail and people aligned to that money.

Character and who sleeps with whom America really doesn't care about.

[–] [deleted] 6 years ago

Everything you say is true (and what I've been saying) but I'm not sure there was no love child. Like Stormy, an awful lot of money to pay put to someone who doesn't have a true story.

[–] NorrinRad (5059) 6 years ago

Everything you say is true (and what I've been saying) but I'm not sure there was no love child. Like Stormy, an awful lot of money to pay put to someone who doesn't have a true story.

Again, the "Love Child" story doesn't have a Habeus Corpus, the alleged mother and the alleged child. And if it did still would not threaten his presidency as it still is not illegal and maybe not even immoral. If true DJT will just be viewed as virile, feral, manly, randy, etc.

Conan the Barbarian Governator has already been there and done that and the world just collectively laughed and shrugged their shoulders.

$30K for a rumor, no matter how salacious, is peanuts for even a quasi-billionaire who is used to buying silence and purchasing loyalty.

[–] Galactus03 (4295) 6 years ago

Of course you guys are failing.to mention the that the enquirer themselves said it was a completely untrue story.....🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄

[–] dlancer (2036) 6 years ago

[deleted]

[–] dlancer (2036) 6 years ago

Lol, what? Why would the Enquirer admit a story they buried was true?

[–] Galactus03 (4295) 6 years ago

Ummm yeah. That's what the two pickle heads above us didn't mention...

[–] [deleted] 6 years ago

You realize the guy who owns the National Enquirer is T-rumps protective friend? Maybe you didn’t.

[–] dlancer (2036) 6 years ago

Why did you need them to mention it?

[–] Galactus03 (4295) 6 years ago

Because they are omitting info

[–] dlancer (2036) 6 years ago

That's absurd. There's a link to the article in the OP.

[–] [deleted] 6 years ago

Well the link I provided covered that. Plus Trump failed to mention that two Hawaii newspapers reported on the birth of Barack Obama in their state back in 1961. So forgive me if I don't mention every possible vindication for the love child issue regarding President Trump.

[–] [deleted] 6 years ago

This story just gets more sordid and ugly by the day.

I never want to hear another conservative go on about the "character" of some Democratic candidate again.

[–] Gd5150 (11135) 6 years ago

LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Poor hate filled demokkkrat lemmings.

[spoiler]#HateDoesNotCreate[/spoiler]

[–] Gd5150 (11135) 14 days ago

And yet another Democrat rectum story that went no where.

But now it’s 2024, surely they’re telling the truth this time.

[–] JoWilli (15607) 14 days ago

wow, is this when Fake News started? lol