MovieChat Forums > Donald Trump Discussion > Federal judge postpones Trump's classifi...

Federal judge postpones Trump's classified records trial with no new date

posted 12 days ago by BKB (6480)
16 replies | jump to latest

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/federal-judge-postpones-trumps-classified-records-trial-indefinitely

Former President Trump’s classified records trial stemming from Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigation has been postponed with no new date, Fox News has learned.

The trial was set to begin on May 20, but Judge Aileen Cannon of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida postponed that date to Tuesday.

In a filing Tuesday, Cannon said that due to the "myriad and interconnected pre-trial" issues "remaining and forthcoming," it would be "imprudent and inconsistent with the Court's duty to fully and fairly consider the various pending pre-trial motions."

"The Court therefore vacates the current May 20, 2024, trial date (and associated calendar call), to be reset by separate order following resolution of the matters before the Court, consistent with Defendants’ right to due process and the public’s interest in the fair and efficient administration of justice," Cannon wrote."

So another words, Jack Smith not being officially appointed killed this trial.. 😂😂😂.. Trump just keeps winning on a daily basis, Whether he's in the Polls steamrolling Biden, or in this kangaroo court making liberal pinheads look foolish

TRUMP 2024

[–] Ranb (7405) 12 days ago

When the trial does start, Trump will probably whine that he did not get a speedy trial as required by the Constitution.

posted an hour ago by BKB (6291)
So another words, Jack Smith not being officially appointed killed this trial.

No. Canon's BS excuse for the delay is "myriad and interconnected pre-trial" issues "remaining and forthcoming,".

[–] tvfan (8793) 11 days ago

The redacted documents that she unsealed is more than enough of an excuse to indefinitely postpone the trial.

The MSM is calling it "issues" to cover/deflect from the actual reason.

Once again, you willfully choose to believe the gaslighting propaganda instead of searching for the truth.

[–] Ranb (7405) 11 days ago

Why is that a good reason to delay the trial? I don't see you searching for the truth. You just make unsupported claims and expect people to believe you.

[–] tvfan (8793) 10 days ago

It's not up to me to search the truth for you.

I don't expect you or anyone to believe me.

I expect others to do their own research, use critical thinking, connect the dots and come to their own conclusion about what the truth is.

This is one of the reasons why I stopped providing links and sources other than for a new post.

It’s well known that the MSM is constantly lying, obfuscating, propagandizing, gaslighting and conveniently omitting many things that go against their narrative and agenda.

[–] Ranb (7405) 10 days ago

It’s well known that the tvfan is constantly lying, obfuscating, propagandizing, gaslighting and conveniently omitting many things that go against her narrative and agenda.

[–] tvfan (8793) 10 days ago

And apparently, you still can't rebuttal.

[–] JoWilli (15646) 11 days ago

Trump wins again, and one day closer to Trump being the real President.

[–] BKB (6480) 11 days ago

I'm just amazed that when there's news like this, no liberals are to be found, but then again, I have 11 of them on ignore, so there's that.. 🤔

[–] Ranb (7405) 10 days ago

Putting people on ignore is like putting your head in the sand. It only affects you and does nothing to anyone else.

[–] Gd5150 (11136) 11 days ago

The walls are closing in.

This trial canned because the FBI was caught tampering with evidence.

Stormy Danials is a complete nothing burger.

All the cases falling apart, like we knew they would.

See the problem for the Democrat rectum is trials need things like evidence, and legal precedence.

[–] tvfan (8793) 10 days ago

The leftoids are whining that the cases are falling apart. It's shattering their fantasy since 'those walls' are crumbling.

[–] Narwhale37 (738) 10 days ago

Why hasn't she rescued herself if she was literally appointed by the person she is doing the case over?

[–] tvfan (8793) 10 days ago

It's postponed, so it doesn't matter. Some other judge can preside over it.

[–] Narwhale37 (738) 10 days ago

Okay, but do you not see a problem with a Trump judge presiding over a Trump case?

[–] tvfan (8793) 10 days ago

Nope.

If the judge is not corrupt or compromised and follows the law, it shouldn't matter.

[–] Narwhale37 (738) 9 days ago

But there's a difference between "corrupt" actions and "inappropriate" ones, right? At least to avoid conflicts of interests?