...is perfectly fine. She is good in Bates Motel and she was good in Transformers. I mean,she didn't exactly needed to bring her whole soul into the role she played in Transformers. I bet if she got famous in another role,like some drama ,you all would be saying she is so great. I don't see why is Emma Stone,for example,better than her.
share A person can't be good looking AND a good actress or a good person.
I mean that's just too greedy...
Passenger side, lighting the sky
Always the first star that I find
You're my satellite...
I don't see why is Emma Stone,for example,better than her.
Emma Stone can act circles around this girl. Emma can go from sad, to angry, to happy within seconds and make it very believable. This girl just has a dull face and even when she tries to put in emotion, it's still dull. She's almost like Kristen Stewart. Emma Stone is at a whole different level than Nicola Peltz and Kristen Stewart.
With that said, I don't hate Nicola Peltz. I do think she's real adorable, cute, and I'm sure a nice person. But let's not ignore her horrible acting just because she's pretty and might be nice. She should continue acting classes. Hope she gets better.
I don't know why Emma stone is better, but she is. Emma Stone can't act for *beep* either though. If you want beauty and talent think Charlize Theron.
This girl is fine though.