He is a "boy" and Wolverine is a man. It gets so old how Hollywood keeps messing up characters to appease some sort of demographic just to get what? Idiocy?
What sucks is that too many people in Hollywood refuse to acknowledge the integrity of characters, and their origin and stay authentic with the character.
I can most certainly bet I am more aware of the start of Wolverine in the comics than you...in fact, I have X-men 94 and bought it when it came out. So piss off
"I can most certainly bet I am more aware of the start of Wolverine in the comics than you"
I'd cheerfully take that bet and your money. I gave up reading comics -- including the X-Men -- before you were born.
However, I'm not interested in seeing how big you think your dick is. I'm commenting on your 'boy' issues and the fact that Egerton is thirty-three... so not a boy.
Did I say anything about Jackman? No, I did not....he would not have been my first choice, either back when this started. Though, I admit, I should have added Egerton is too "boyish"....
No, you didn't but you didn't have to. If you didn't think Jackman was a "man" either when he was hired, then you would have mentioned it as the obvious example instead of Cruise/Reacher. I never suggested that Jackman would have been your first choice, but you obviously think Jackman wasn't a "boy". I make this assumption because I assume you're not an idiot.
Though, I admit, I should have added Egerton is too "boyish"....
There you go. Now you're making sense.
Of course, there's a few threads below yours talking about how it he looks very old/weathered, so maybe you're clueless about what Taron actually looks and sounds like right now.
reply share