Not in the Top 250?
This film is NOT in the Top 250 because it doesn't have the required 25,000 ratings, even though its 8.1 rating would put it above a quarter of the list. This is barbaric. The fact that it took Netflix a year to send me the DVD goes a long way toward explaining why it doesn't have enough ratings. If you're not over 50, you probably haven't seen it, and you have to buy it if you want to. It's disgraceful that IMDb ratings are so slanted toward blockbuster CGI films of the last decade or two. The minimum number of ratings should be proportionally lower for older films to compensate for unavailability.
share