Here's an interesting comparison: Man 2(as it is called in some quarter) comes 10 years before Hitchcock's badly reviewed Torn Curtain, which also featured two big stars(Paul Newman and Julie Andrews) and one of THEM was a singer(Andrews.) What makes Man 2 "better" than Torn Curtain?
Well, take a look. Whereas the big "ballet scene" in Torn Curtain is good(check out the "freeze frame ballerina"), the concert scene in Man 2 is BIGGER...filmed on location in London at Albert Hall and with many more extras and many more shots, than the small scale soundstage sequence in Torn Curtain. Hitchcock was ten years younger, he had the stamina to make a better sequence and the backing(from Paramount) to get to fly to London to make the scene "real."
And Paramount flew Hitchcock and his cast to Morocco AS WELL AS London. This was a globe-trotting, big budget film. All the foreign locations in Torn Curtain were shown through process shots made by a second unit in Germany. Newman and Andrews(who wasn't given a song to sing, like Day) did their scenes at USC in LA and Long Beach Harbort to emulate the Iron Curtain countries.
Yes, The Man Who Knew Too Much '56, despite some stodginess(Stewart and Day are married, and never really kiss) and pacing issues, is a much bigger and better Hitchcock production than Torn Curtain, a film made deep in his period of greatest clout, commercial success and artful skill.
With at least three major Hitchcock set-pieces: the stabbing and confession of Louis Bernard(his huge mouth, Stewart's huge ear, Stewart's deep blue eyes in ultra close-up); Albert Hall, and the rescue of the little boy(another great Hitchcock staircase scene.)
Plus one of the great "quickie" Hitchcock final lines: "Sorry we're late -- we had to go pick up Hank."
reply
share