MovieChat Forums > Hell to Eternity (1960) Discussion > Was this consider risque when it was rel...

Was this consider risque when it was released?


I wasn't alive in 1960 but it seems like the apartment scene would have raised some eyebrows. A movie with three marines hooking up with 3 strange women, going to one woman's apartment and then having a strip exhibition before a fade to black moment on the balcony? Ike was still president and the Hays code was still in place when this was filmed.

reply

Yes, it was. The studio had to cut much, and in some cases all, of the striptease routine in order for the movie to be shown in some areas (mostly the South, and mostly because of the hint of the possibility of interracial sex, as the strippers were Asian).

It was also considered "controversial" because of the realistic depiction of violence, especially in the hand-to-hand battle when the Americans and Japanese met on the slope. Up to that point battle deaths in war pictures were usually pretty neat and tidy and totally unrealistic--the fighting comes to a screeching halt while the young GI who'd just been shot is cradled in his buddy's arms, with a thin trickle of blood runnng down his chin, whispering, "Tell mom I love her!" before he closes his eyes and dies peacefully--but in this picture soldiers scream when they're hit, you can see them get stabbed, shot, clubbed, and in one scene a Marine shoots a Japanese soldier and you actually see--via squibs, of course--the bullets stitch across his stomach and blood pour out of the wounds; that particular scene caused a big controversy in some circles. I was 12 years old when it came out and my friend and I had to sneak into the theater because they wouldn't let us in to see it. We got in anyway, I liked it then and I like it now. It's a damn good picture.




reply

Watching it from a whole new perspective on TCM today. Hayakawa. Takei! Strong story. True.

reply

[deleted]

This film was a childhood favorite of mine and my brothers, from showings on our local TV stations in New York City. The whole Honolulu partying sequence was entirely new to me, apparently cut.

The film was actually better without it. It is out of keeping with the rest of the film. And the girls never reappear, or have any bearing on anything that occurs in the rest of the film.

PS
It was definitely entitled, "From Hell To Eternity" when I saw it.

reply

I was amazed it was in there ... it took about 15% of the movie and did nothing to advance the story.

reply

It was meant to get the money from horny teen boys....

reply