Whoo Hoo! It's rare that I get to respond to one of the actual "historical anachronism" gun nuts.
1. First, it's a "fantasy drama", not a documentary. Flintlock pistols look more "old fashioned", and it may just be an art director's choice to use them.
2. Even if set in a "real-world", flintlock weaponry may be adequate for the mission at hand, or the budget that the protagonist desired to spend. Not every private militia can afford the latest and greatest thing. Pirates and other bandits used flintlock weapons for close up attacks long after percussion cap weapons came into play.
3. In 1868, percussion cap weapons had only been around for 30 years (coming in around 1830 with the US military still using flintlocks in 1840), yet flintlock weapons had been around for 220 years at that point - there was a VERY gradual transition to percussion weapons, it wasn't instantaneous in a few years or less. (see above).
Frontiersmen and others in the far west went to percussion rifles when available, but that took awhile to occur.
So all in all, I don't think this is a valid "goof" or anacronism, and it should be removed. It's a trivial point at best.
reply
share