MovieChat Forums > Cape Fear (1962) Discussion > I Wonder What It Would Have Been Like If...

I Wonder What It Would Have Been Like If . . .


. . . Gregary Peck had played Max Cady instead. I love Robert Mitchum in it, but it would be interesting to see Peck as the psychopath in this film.

I would say that he'd play a less humorous villain than Mitchum did. He'd probably would have played it more like a normal psychopath than Mitchum's unsettlingly creepy and gross performance. Don't get me wrong, he probably could have played it well, but just not with the same effect as Mitchum. What do you think?

reply

I doubt if Peck had the balls to pull a perfomace like that.
And the other thing is Peck is just to cute to play a psycho and a viscious ex-con

Better packin' one not needin' it rather being in deep *beep* not havin' it

reply

He didn't. He was offered the role of Max Cady originally (according to the trivia page) but turned it down and wanted to do the father. I was just wondering what other people thought it would be like if he had had the balls to.

reply

It wouldn't have been good as it was.
Is there any movie that Peck played a villain?

Better packin' one not needin' it rather being in deep *beep* not havin' it

reply

EXACTLY...

I can't picture Peck playing a vicious villian at all...

If he did, the movie would've probably sucked...

"To hardly know someone is to know them well."--Cary Grant, The Philadelphia Story, 1940

reply

Actually Peck played a villain in Lust in the Dust ... Ooops ... that's supposed to be Duel in the Sun. Hee.

It's an extremely melodramatic, giggle-inducing western/soap opera but young Peck is charismatic and bad, bad, bad as a spoiled scion of a rich rancher turned gunfighter.

I think he could have played a baddy well but I don't think he would have measured up to Mitchum's chilling Max Cady.

reply

Gregory Peck looks too boyish and sophisicated to play Cady, even when he was in his 40s. I suspect his performance as Cady wouldn't be convincing at all. He just doesn't look scary or intimidating! Now Mitchum on the other hand... VERY imtimidating! Wouldn't want him wandering around my neighbourhood!


reply

Yup, i definitely agree with u on this!

reply

Peck plays mengelee in boys from brazil: pure evil

reply

that book scared me spitless

reply

He can indeed play evil, He was exelent in Boys from brazil.

reply

[deleted]

Peck isn't seen as a real villain very often, but considering the performance he managed in THE BOYS FROM BRAZIL, it might have worked OK. Hard to believe it would have been better than Mitchum's. but it would have been interesting to see what he could do.

Sometimes these old actors surprise the hell out of us. Anyone who's seen Andy Griffith in A FACE IN THE CROWD is usually blown completely away if they've only seen him as Sheriff Andy of Mayberry. Griffith's ability to play a truly evil and monstrous character is amazing, and he's probably one of the most under-utilized actors of his time. A shame, really.

reply

This is funny. I thing of Caddy as a "candid, smiling alligator"...
Peck's father I think a bit touched in the head. "obsessional". Very good acting. Something like a volcano on the verge of eruption throughout the movie.

I loved his "lewton" in hump in the sump/Duel in the sun. The movie inspired the man who made the remake of cape fear.

I made comment on it, and some questions in post.

Has anybody watched Mr Peck playing captain Ahab ? That's a negative obsessional character, if not...

em

reply

I remembered his Mengele performance, but had forgotten Captain Ahab. Peck certainly was capable of doing an obsessional villain. His Max Cady might have been really interesting.

reply

i just don't think peck could come across as playing a man so indecent and crude, sure he could play evil, but could he play dirty??

reply

again--duel in the sun. But he is dirty in a different way. Use 'em and leave 'em

"I see the people from the big jet plane. The woman looks Teutonic. She drinks a vodka tonic ... "

reply

The comments about Peck not having the "balls" to play Max Cady makes no sense at all, he was a professional and knew which character he would be best suited for. As for your crude comment of not having courage, I may be in the minority here but I think the Bowden character was much more courageous than Cady. Sure Cady was not afraid of people, he was afraid of something much tougher to face, the truth, it was much easier for him to blame everyone but himself for the trouble he was in, that takes no courage at all.

Both Peck and Mitchum turn in great performances and I think they worked very well together.

reply

Amen to all of your comments, scamper67. Cady knew no fear because he was a psychopath, with no inhibitions about killing whoever got in his way. As such, he cannot be said to have had "courage", since courage has a moral component to it. Gregory Peck was wise to choose the role of Sam Bowden rather than the Cady role - I think he would've been totally miscast as Cady.

Overall, a terrific movie with great performances.

reply

[deleted]

Gregory Peck convincingly played Max's shady lawyer in the remake to Cape Fear (ironically, Robert Mitchum played a good guy cop). I couldn't believe it was Peck. I have no doubt that Peck could have played the villain in the original.

reply

The thing is that Bowden is the less showy part to play and in some aspects simpler and in other harder. For some reason Peck has some very stiff moments in his performance which rarely hapenns to him. Think of the scene where he tells that he'll need "JUST ONE" deputy. Pure camp! Evrybody already mentioned Duel in the Sun and The Boys From Brazil where his villains were probably untinteionally comic in some scenes. I can't name any from the first, but the "Shut up, you ugly bitch!" scene in the second is my all time favorite Peck moment. So I'm sure Peck's version of Cady would have been very amusing and interesting to watch, although not as effective as Mitchum's ultimately was.

But let's think of it on the flip side - what if Mitch had played Sam? It seems sort of unlikely for him to play an average working Joe family man with inhibitions, since he usually plays a tough badass. Howerver, you should see him in Two For the Seesaw from the same year where he plays a way more complex insecure middle aged man than Peck does in Cape Fear and manages to pull it off without a hitch in his perfromance, unlike Peck. So I think that Bob could have played the Peck part better than him and as well as his Cady role.

I'm here, Mr. Man, I can not tell no lie and I'll be right here 'till the day I die

reply

Sometimes, an actor playing against type can be highly effective. As others have mentioned, Andy Griffith played against type in A Face in the Crowd. I was born after that movie was made, and I didn't see it until two years ago. I did see Griffith play the villain for the first time in a 1974 TV movie titled Savages. The fact that he wasn't playing the good guy heightened the fright level several notches for me. Seeing Peck playing a villain could elevate the creep factor based on that fact alone.

reply

I'm a huge Gregory Peck fan. He was soooo gorgeous. (I didn't find Mitchum's portrayal at all humorous. I found him chilling).

The only time I saw Peck in anything other than a leading man was as Captain Ahab in Moby Dick. I thought he was very miscast.

He was very good in some Hitchcock movies. Oh, and of course To Kill a Mockingbird.

reply