The bow and stern in particular as the body is more or less like the Triton.
Way too much additional wetted surface? Turbulance and instabiolity production?
Any naval architects or hydrodynamics experts out there?
[deleted]
Also when you go over 700 feet under the Ocean it's almost always pitch black. Jaques Cousteau once said he sat inside a window compartment that opened to the sea in one of his voyages and said there was nothing to see for HOURS. The open ocean was a dessert, was how he described it. 🐳🐡
shareI used to look at the arrangement of Seaview's fins in the stern, how they were at 2, 4, 8, and 10 o'clock, as opposed to being at 12, 3, 6, and 9 o'clock, and I had never seen a real sub with fins like that, and didn't think it would work.
But the Germans now have an advanced non-nuke sub, the 212A, which has the stern fins in that arrangement:
http://www.westbourne-model.co.uk/acatalog/212_total3_400%20%281%29.jp g
Turns out the sub can maneuver in shallower water that way, which is an advantage in spy missions.
[deleted]
remember that windows were supposed to be made of transparent steel, invented by adm Nelson called Herculite®
shareremember that windows were supposed to be made of transparent steel, invented by adm Nelson called Herculite® - darkness_surroundz
A few years ago I read an article about an RC model of the Seaview. The builder/operator stated that the 'Cadillac fins' created instabilities.
share