Chills down your spine


This was one SCARY movie.

reply

(WARNING... Spoiler?) I don't know if I'm adding a spoiler here or not, I might be, so I added a warning.


I have to agree. I recorded it from the TCM channel early Saturday, August 11 (I put 'early' because it was part of a Vincent Price movie block they were showing all Friday night and the next morning) it was the first time I'd ever seen it and as I watched, the movie was so intense that I got chills. Price did Prospero's role wonderfully.

If Price didn't win a major award for his roles in this, he should have. (I say 'roles' plural because I notice him playing another role at the end) I think everyone who worked on this deserved a major award.
I like how they added the ending quote from the book: "And Darkness and Decay and the Red Death held illimitable dominion over all."

reply

I think this movie is much scarier than the other Corman Poe adaptations because it seems so dark and uncompromised. There is a "love interest," I suppose, but it certainly isn't given the same amount of attention as in a movie like House of Usher. This is a movie about satanism, death, immoral decadence, the absence of God...deep stuff for a drive-in chiller!

What's the Spanish for drunken bum?

reply

Someone elsewhere commented that the Fifties and Sixties horror films were aimed at children, that they weren't considered entertainment for adults! Being a child in the Fifites who became a teen in the Sixties, I could verify that families went to these films, packing the theaters, and that the films definitely were not "kid stuff"! Many of them don't even have children in the cast, so I doubt they were aimed especially at youngsters.

I was questioning why Gen XY are always claiming to be "traumatized" by films they saw in their childhood or later. I don't recall us ever being "marked" by these films are those that came earlier. Think about the bathroom scene in "The Tingler"!

I guess we took horror in stride, along with other genres.



*** The trouble with reality is there is no background music. ***

reply

The movie isn't so much scary as it is disturbing. I found the most disturbing elements to be in the way the Prospero and the privileged elite acted. These people were downright horrible. Making it scary is the fact that it showcases just how evil human nature can really be. We like to ignore this element of life because it is disturbing, but the degree of vileness inherent within the human race seems to know no bounds. The Red Death was depicted as uncompromising and subject to nothing, whether the claims of faith made by the heroine or the claims of dominion through Satan that came from Prospero. There was no Satan to save Prospero any more than there was a God to save the Christian believers. There was only the Red Death.

- - - - - - -
Whose idea was it for the word "Lisp" to have an "S" in it?

reply

It was not really a scary film although one of the characters seems to have a bad acid trip!

Its that man again!!

reply

To me, the scariest part is how coldhearted and cruel Prospero was. He had absolutely no compassion whatsoever and no regard for human life; exactly how I picture Satan. I loved the ending and how surreal it was. The part where Alfredo was burned alive and people cared very little, continuing to party anyways, was rather disturbing. It doesn't seem like your straightforward, stereotypical horror movie. It is very unique and very deep.

reply

Edgar Allen Poe's tale can still be seen as relevant today. All around the world, the elite are treading on the "peasants". Corruption seems to be as old as time itself.

It also reiterates that whatever your social standing, or whether you be rich or poor, plagues (and other illnesses) do not discriminate.

Good film with a great cast and lavish sets.

reply

Not bad - 7.5

"She let me go."
~White Oleander

reply