MovieChat Forums > Doctor Zhivago (1965) Discussion > Why did Zhivago never pursue Lara after ...

Why did Zhivago never pursue Lara after the last time he saw her?


It is very vague in the movie, why Zhivago did not pursue Lara! It really irks me. He was so in love, why didn't he try to find her again? The book as I understand it is equally vague about why Zhivago doesn't pursue Lara- he even goes on to have an affair with another woman in the book. In the movie he convinces her to leave and she goes because she is pregnant with his kid. (She is not very careful with her kids as she seems to lose both of them so I am not sure why she was so eager to leave to protect her pregnant child, they could have escaped together). But even if they decided to part for safety, why did Zhivago never go meet with her, or arrange to meet with her?

reply

She is not very careful with her kids as she seems to lose both of them so I am not sure why she was so eager to leave to protect her pregnant child, they could have escaped together). But even if they decided to part for safety, why did Zhivago never go meet with her, or arrange to meet with her?


Lara was careful enough with her kids; she only lost the younger one (Zhivago's daughter) because she was hospitalized with typhus or diphtheria (forget which) and Komarovsky abandoned her when the civil war in Mongolia reached their town.(In the novel, Tanya is separated from Lara rather differently). Katya stays with Lara (she would have been around 16-17 when Zhivago's child was lost); in the book, Lara brings her to Moscow to enroll in school there, and is there when she finds out about Zhivago's death. So she did not lose her daughter by Pasha.

There were several good reasons for Zhivago not pursuing Lara. First, she and Komarovsky fled to another country. He could not trust Komarovsky to protect him if he accompanied them (as a former aristocrat and a deserter he was likely to be executed), and he did not have the documents to travel abroad; besides which, Lara herself said, "Yuri will never leave Russia."

He definitely loved her in some way -- she was the inspiration for his poetry -- but in the books he clearly feels some lasting attachment to Tonya, corresponds with her and his children, and tries to arrange either passage out of Russia for himself or a way for them to come back. However, he was still in a relationship with Marina, the mother of his two daughters. He did not see Lara from the tram -- only in the movie. In the book, he has a heart attack getting off the tram, but not because he recognized someone.

reply

It's apparent neither of you have read the novel (and that's not intended as a criticism). The entire point of the book and film is that Yuri represents Russia. He will never leave the motherland. He can't do so, even when his wife and son are in France.

reply

It's apparent neither of you have read the novel


LOL, of course I read the novel (several times). That's where the part about Marina and her daughters comes from, and also many other differences from book to film. As for the "entire point" of both film and movie being that Yuri represents Russia -- I beg to disagree. It is one point, and a major one, but there are a number of others, equally important. These include the dilemma of the individual vs. the collective, the pressure to conform to ideology rather than to take responsibility for one's own beliefs, commitments and actions, the lack of agency of the individual, especially in turbulent times (Zhivago is basically a passive character who is our window on his world; this is a device in other Russian novels as well), how idealism and idealists are corrupted in their implementation, how individuals' lives are torn apart by war and social upheaval, and they are oppressed by the State (Pasternak is critical of Communism, but doesn't give the absolutist czarist regime a pass either).

The book, like many other Russian novels (Brothers Karamazov is a good example) is full of long and involved philosophical and ideological discussions, and the characters are more three-dimensional than in the film. Zhivago does not come out a hero; he betrays his own ideals and his last years are mired in failure and a sense of futility. Strelnikov comes off better than in the film, as his love for Lara is a constant and his idealism, while thwarted and twisted, never gets completely stamped out.

It's interesting to read the two major Eglish translations and note some differences. The most recent is reputedly more true to the poetic spirit of the original Russian, and has a lyrical quality the earlier (1958) translation lacked.

As for why Yuri did not leave Russia -- that brings us back to another major point, that Yuri in many ways is a personification of Pasternak himself, who was torn between love for two women (and, like Zhivago, others), love for beauty and art, in contrast to the ugliness all around him, and passionate love of Russia. Yuri could not, in practical terms, have left the country even had he wished to do so; Pasternak, too, rejected the idea of leaving although his situation was of course different but both staying and going were fraught with peril.

reply