MovieChat Forums > The Sand Pebbles (1966) Discussion > Richard Crenna on Steve McQueen's perfor...

Richard Crenna on Steve McQueen's performance


Crenna was in awe of McQueen's utterly intuitive, physical performance and it's a pleasure to hear his commentary on the DVD.

Here's just one of his observations: "Watch Steve carry his sea bag up the gangplank to the San Pablo. The way he's carrying it, you know that guy has carried that gear a hundred times to a hundred ships in a hundred different ports in the world.

Steve has never been better than he is in this film. You hear the comment 'born to play a role.' He was born to play this role. His use of props, his use of weapons, his use of the engine - the engine becomes an integral part of the story, the engine was a character and Steve plays with that character as if he's with another actor. He just brings such a realism to what he does. It's incredible... He's always been a physical actor, his movement is very athletic, very sure, very strong. Even stationary, Steve is moving."

reply

Thats why this one is at the top of my list (of any movie/actor).

reply

Mr. McQueen is pitch perfect in what I consider a perfect film.

"Thus, we began our longest journey together."
Adult Scout, 'To Kill A Mockingbird'

reply

I thought Richard Crenna's performance as the Captain was spot on. It's no doubt a Steve McQueen movie, but all of the supporting cast knocked it out as far as I'm concerned.

reply

Richard Crenna's best performance. McQueen's, too.

reply

[deleted]

Having liked both actors very much since my childhood early in their careers, I was very pleased by Crenna's assements of McQueen's performance and talents within that audio commentary. But I'll share a "consumer" story of my own.

THE SAND PEBBLES is one of my top-10 favorites; and once in the early '90s I showed my 16mm print to two friends who had never seen the film. During the first reel change I mentioned that I had forgotten to tell them that McQueen received his only Oscar nomination for this picture -- and didn't win. The husband said, "Gee ... I wonder why," to which I heard the wife giggle.

I had not been in the same room with them while I was rethreading the projector; but when I stuck my head through the doorway, I saw they were both grinning at me. During the five or six years we had known each other, I had enjoyed a number of film conversations with them both -- but I never knew until they confirmed right then that both shared a low opinion of McQueen's range as an actor.

Well, that's a very uninformed opinion to hold, and I simply couldn't resume the movie without trying to set them straight. We were only a quarter of the way into the film, but I told them they would not appreciate it fully if they couldn't understand why McQueen had been a BRILLIANT actor: how he conveyed more emotions, thought, and attitude physically, through eyes, face and body, posture and movement, than many performers could get across through a page of dialogue -- and how the Jake Holman role was a specifically introverted character to start with. Then I pointed out a few different moments they had seen so far to demonstrate what I meant.

Then, to resume my role as a good host I apologized for interrupting the movie for that lecture, and we resumed the film. We had no more conversation before the picture ended; and I'm glad to relate that by then, both husband and wife agreed that the movie had gained in strength -- and that McQueen's performance WAS better than they had first believed.

We could all remain friends.

But now comes a still happier epilogue: Very late that evening after my guests had gone, I got a phone call from a friend in California. Because he was then writing a "bio-bibliography" of director Robert Wise, I recently had lent him my pressbooks and roadshow souvenir programs for SAND PEBBLES and STAR TREK - THE MOTION PICTURE for his convenient, pre-Internet reference.

In fact, he was phoning me to tell me that just that week he finally had watched THE SAND PEBBLES for the first time, from a letterboxed laserdisc. From past conversations I knew he hadn't seen it because in his youth, he had expected it would be "three hours of people sitting around talking on boats." But because for years my friend had known MY love of the movie, he wanted to share that there had been moments while watching it that he had asked himself: "Am I looking at the greatest actor who ever lived?"

I explained to him why that message had come at just the right time for me!


Most great films deserve a more appreciative audience than they get.

reply

Great post. This was posted on imdb which makes me hate the powers-that-be that pulled the plug on the boards there even more.

reply

As is famously known, McQueen was in fact a former US Marine who served at sea with distinction, decorated in fact for his sea duty. He knew what to do in this role.

Get the facts first - you can distort them later!

reply

Couldn't agree more! His performance is absorbing...

reply

Listening to the commentary on the dvd gave me a whole new insight into this film that I've loved for many years.

McQueen's best? .. Maybe, but Love With A Proper Stranger has to also be considered as his best.

Crenna's best? .. Maybe, but The Flamingo Kid has to also be considered as his best.

reply

Crenna was in awe of McQueen's utterly intuitive, physical performance and it's a pleasure to hear his commentary on the DVD.

Here's just one of his observations: "Watch Steve carry his sea bag up the gangplank to the San Pablo. The way he's carrying it, you know that guy has carried that gear a hundred times to a hundred ships in a hundred different ports in the world.

I've got to get this DVD for that commentary now. Just this little snippet gave me chills.

reply

I didn't like the way he talked. He did some weird mouth movements. Distracting.

reply