MovieChat Forums > American Graffiti (1973) Discussion > Why doesn't this movie get more respect?

Why doesn't this movie get more respect?


When I see a list of the greatest movies ever made American Graffiti is never on that list. Now granted it's no Citizen Kane but it's a great movie and it is totally worthy to be on these types of lists. Except for people who maybe grew up with that era (1962)and the era when the movie came out (1973) no one ever talks about it. It sure left an impression on me and my friends. I saw it as a 13 year old in 1973 and it is indelibly burned into my mind now. It sure resonated with me.

reply

Me as well, and I'm the exact same age as you. However, look at some of the posts on this board...some people write it off as soon as they see what time period it takes place in. I actually got into a pissing match with another poster on this board a couple years ago because he thought that no kids ever stayed up all night in 1962!

reply

It's very popular in Japan: https://www.facebook.com/groups/americangraffiti.jp/


reply

This doesn't surprise me as I understand that Japan has a pretty popular car culture and I could see them digging the older hotrods.

reply

This movie is a bona-fide classic and it certainly should be in the IMDB Top 250. Should be in the top 75 at least.

reply

I think part of the reason the two generations that have come since its release disrespect it is because in the last 17 years it's become hip to trash on George Lucas because of how things went with the Star Wars prequel films. So without even watching it, they see it was Lucas' second movie and read about a rather simple plot and run it down. Had it been, for instance, Spielberg's name that were attached to it, you wouldn't have it. So that's my theory for part of the issue. But yes, it is grossly underrated.

I love it, personally. I came 13 years after its release and 24 years after its setting, but I have a great affinity for that era, its music, and of course its automobiles, and this film was all of those things beautifully rolled into one. When one watches it and realizes the time period in which it was actually filmed and all that had happened in that decade-plus and the massive contrast Lucas portrayed on screen compared to contemporary life in 1973 (again I wasn't around but in the age of the internet it's not hard to discover what life was like though I'll never have that first-hand experience), in my eyes it becomes a masterful piece of film-making. I absolutely fell in love with it when I finally watched it three years ago, but that's the thing. It has to be seen to be appreciated and these people won't sit down and give it the viewing - and, consequentially, the respect - that it deserves. It's just great. Great plot, great characters, great setting, great cinematography, great music, great cars. Just a great movie.

reply

I agree with all those things you said but it was shot too darkly.

reply

It is easy to think that if you base "respect" on publicity and references in trendy websites and articles. Unlike in the past, newer generations have less of a connection to the past and less knowledge of what is a pivotal film even if they are watching movies influenced by them in ways they don't realize.

reply

See my post at http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0069704/board/nest/250471041?d=250471041#250471041

reply

I have seen American Graffiti twice on the big screen now (both times since 2013). The film is good—and quietly fatalistic; I like it. However, I hardly consider American Graffiti a great film, and I was actually surprised to see that it received so much acclaim back in 1973-1974 (major Oscar nominations, Golden Globe triumphs, and so forth). Something such as High Plains Drifter or even Charley Varrick, from that same year, was vastly superior in my opinion yet received little critical acclaim and certainly no awards attention. Like some other films from the early 1970s (or most any time period, actually), such as Patton and The French Connection, American Graffiti is a commendable movie yet hardly the great classic that one would imagine based on Academy Award nominations or victories. It is a modest movie—not exactly riveting, bristling with intensity, deeply probing, or wondrously reflective, but nevertheless atmospheric and mildly mesmerizing. American Graffiti's distinguishing attribute is that one does not necessarily recognize the film's fatalism until after it is over and ones sees the postscript, yet one then understands that the movie was fatalistic all along. Director George Lucas achieves a sort of sentimental existentialism and ambiguous innocence, the latter quality perfectly capturing how America (white, at least somewhat bourgeois America, anyway) in 1973 would have looked back at 1962.

To me, American Graffiti is a good film, but one with certain limitations. Yet as with The French Connection (which I deem inferior to Dirty Harry, which did not receive any awards attention) and some other films of that era, American Graffiti's whole is greater than the sum of its parts. Movies from that time period did not feel compelled to explain everything the way that films often do now, and the result was somehow enlarging. A movie should not be analogous to a Wikipedia page.

reply

Huh, I have the exact opposite opinion in Anerican Graffiti and French Connection compared to High Plains Drifter. The former are timeless, near perfect classics, while the latter is a good albeit lesser film.

~ I'm a 21st century man and I don't wanna be here.

reply

"American Graffiti" is, without any doubt, a great film, and a classic film.

reply

[deleted]

I know that this is an old post, but American Graffiti DID get respect. It spawned tons of other movies and TV shows, as well as the huge 1950s revival wave of the 1970s.

What happened is that Star Wars eclipsed it to such an extent that people stopped talking about it because they wanted to focus more on the franchise.

reply