I didn´t get it.


Oskar decides, not to grow, so he becomes non of those grown-ups.
But why?
I didn´t get it.
At the point in the movie, he decides this, there havn´t been seen so many grown-ups.
And Oskar is confronted to them- in the movie- only shortly after his birth and during that party in his parent´s flat.
But what is sooo bad about the behaviour of those people, that he makes that decision?
Sorry, I think the movie didn´t get it to show the reason for Oskar´s repulsion against grown-ups, which makes the movie a total failure.

reply

There is a lot of symbolism in this story, and the message needs to be considered other than literally. His three parents respective nationalities represent the agricultural traditions of old Europe in conflict with industrial development. His decision to stop growing is timed with the early rise of the Nazis, and his decision to start growing again with his migration to the west. Oskar is the 20th century European, torn between cherishing an idealized rural past and a cosmopolitan future, who's growth is spitefully stunted by the war.
It is easier to gather this from to book, only about 2/3 of which were made into the film. There are some wonderfully poetic language and images which were left out, but then we would have had a six-hour movie. One thing that stands out for me is his educational reading material, pages torn from a trashy biography of Rasputin and Goethe's "Elective Affinities", the dark Dionysian and the bright Apollonian, form and chaos.
I'm really not intellectually disciplined enough, or arrogant, to claim that I completely understand the film or the author's intent, but I have always loved this movie for it's artistic value, for the impressions that it has left on my consciousness. I would recommend reading the book, and then trying the movie again--it's a very rich dish that deserves repeated tasting.

reply

Thank you very much for the reply. Very interesting information. You have mentioned many aspects I haven´t seen before.
But for me the movie is just too disgusting to watch it again, and some parts of the book ( I haven´t read the whole) disgusted me as well and the style is too artificial for my taste.

reply

That's fair; not every dish is to everyone's taste. My mother was disgusted by it, too. She couldn't get past Oskar's preoccupation with his grandmother's skirts. I appreciate that you gave it a even chance.

reply

What was the symbolism of the Blechttrummel? Could you please explain that too me as well? Also, the screaming, if that symbolizes something, that would be great too if you could explain. And finally, the little people, what did they symbolize?

reply

I'm not the greatest authority on symbolism, so if anybody else out there has an opinion, feel free to chime in or disagree.

I see the tin drum as representing the world itself, the material reality which the artist (Oskar), or the politician (in this case, Hitler) beats as he sees fit. He manipulates the drum, the world, to express his own artistic ambitions, both creative and destructive. His voice, his scream, likewise expresses that, but more specifically to destroy. As Hitler's speeches incited hatred and destruction of all the finer aspect of Germanic and European culture, so does Oskar's voice shatter or deface glass--both finely crafted works of art or commonplace items.

The little people are just that...the common folk, the proletariat, the untermenschen, who are overlooked by the upperclass and politicians in the grand scheme of things.

Like I said, I may be full of sheisen, so don't take my word for anything.

reply

I enjoy your input, thank you.

reply

[deleted]

Thank you for your analysis, tjantus! I didn't entirely understand the film, but what a fascinating journey it was.

reply