I have looked on Roger Ebert's review site and he doesn't have this film among others on it. I don't think it was right when it was stated the site had every review he did. Anyway,i know this sequel got mostly negative reviews but i know some people that liked it, and i see some posters liked it also. If anyone knows what they thaught of it, i would like to hear it. Thanks.
share[deleted]
I remember them reveiwing this film when it came out. Neither liked it. Siskel had a lot of negative things to say but said it was worth seeing for the Veitnam sequence which was the best part of the movie.
shareYes, they reviewed it on an episode of their show that someone has been kind enough to upload onto IMDB. Siskel voted "no" and in his print review gave it 2 out of 4 stars. Ebert actually voted "yes" meaning he recommended it. I haven't found any written review from him. Indeed there are multiple reviews missing from his website. I wish someone would get to work finding and uploading them. https://www.imdb.com/videoplayer/vi796572441?ref_=ttvi_vi_imdb_30
share