Underrated


This is a stand up horror/erotic thriller, the music by David Bowie and Moroder is brilliant it captures the mood so well, it is finely acted by all Natassia was a brave soul to accept this role she did well in it, Heard, McDowell, O'Toole and the rest of the supporting cast were all fine.
I must admit I haven't seen the original - though in the DVD special's Schrader claims it's not really a remake & thus shouldn't really be compared to one another.
One of the best horror's ive seen in a while.
reccomended - 3/5 stars.

reply

I loved this film. Kinski's performance was captivating. I must check out some more of Paul Schrader's films.

reply


I agree. And I agree that it shouldn't really be compared with the 1942 version, which is a totally different breed of animal. I love both versions, in different ways.

Ozy

reply

Yah, it's a good movie with a mesmerizing erotic atmosphere and surrealistic sequences.
As the OP and others mentioned before, it's not a remake.
While it has the same fitting title like the 1942 movie, it's another story.


SPOILERS follow SPOILERS follow SPOILERS follow SPOILERS follow SPOILERS


Irena (Nastassja Kinski) on her night trip through the wilderness, discovering and exploring her true nature was fascinating. Of course with the inevitable snake. 🐍​ ☺

The ending works well, but is frustrating and I didn't see real love there.
In a longer review it was nicely described:
"Oliver plays the power play of masculinity. He is, in fact, the creator and maintainer of rules, as zoologist and zoo manager. He 'knows' the boundaries 'animals' should be kept within, marks them, and maintains them. More than the result of animalistically induced attraction, his obsession with Irena is characterized by an abusive dominance pattern. He gets upset when she is not compliant and, frankly, he seems pretty pleased when she is eventually locked up under his control and he can pet her at his will."
https://popmec.hypotheses.org/3630

reply