MovieChat Forums > Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome (1985) Discussion > the Pilot + The Gyro Captain; one and th...

the Pilot + The Gyro Captain; one and the same person?


The "Gyro Captain" from Mad Max 2 and "Jedediah the Pilot" from Mad Max 3 are played by the same actor, yet they are supposed to be different characters? What did the producers think? "Hey, we need to find a new pilot guy for MM3"-"I don't care, just ask Bruce Spence if he wants to do it again."

Or are they supposed to be the same character? If so, why doesn't he recognize Max at all? In addition, he has a small child in MM3 - like the growling kid from Mad Max 2.
Seriously, this bugged me a lot when I rewatched the triology.

reply

There is nothing to indicate he doesn't recognize Max. Consider that he initially couldn't have known who was driving the camel caravan. Now consider that the Gyro Captain/Jedediah the Pilot knows Max as the tough justice type. Even if they were friends in the past, would GC/JTP rush to tell Max that he unintentionally screwed him over? The small child was the result of the GC/JTP's relationship with the woman character from the Road Warrior known only as "The Captain's Girl".

Father wrote about this in his book Ch1Pg1Par1 What is the answer to 99 out of 100 questions? Money.

reply

[deleted]

Different characters.

The narrator / wild kid from mad max 2 tells at the end, the gyro captain became their leader after they got away.

reply

Notice his teeth in RW and then MMBT.

reply

I actually thought the new teeth was just a decision to not spend time or money on makeup. Or possibly the art of orthodontics was not lost on the day after.

reply

It was the kid who became their leader, not the Gyro Captain.

reply

It was the kid who became their leader, not the Gyro Captain.


he became their leader when he was older but the Gyro Captain became leader at the end of the film

reply

I know. But the voice over is from the kid. He became the leader. Who cares about what the Gyro Captain became ?

reply

At the end of ROAD WARRIOR/MAD MAX 2 the narrator clearly states that the people found a new leader: the Gyro Captain; and that "... in the fullness of time I [meaning himself, "the Feral Kid"] became the leader of the Great Northern Tribe." Therefore, he took over after the time when the Gyro Captain had served as leader. He needed time to grow up and to learn to speak rather than grunt -- right?

Who cares about what the Gyro Captain became ?
It separates viewers who listen and understand from those who don't.

The Gyro Captain and Jedediah the Pilot are separate characters who appear in two separate stories, regardless of whether both are played by the same actor. In Sergio Leone's Man With No Name Westerns, Gian Maria Volonte portrays the villain in two different pictures, neither the same character. And Lee Van Cleef is a hero in FOR A FEW DOLLARS MORE, yet the villain in THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY. Were those audiences confused? No.

The viewers of years ago had more sense than to waste time debating whether characters with different names, personalities, and behaviors are intended to be the same person. But today, the Internet allows all sorts of distracted people (who are only half-watching a film anyway) to feel that their uninformed opinions are not to be challenged.

Director Anthony Mann's WINCHESTER '73, THE NAKED SPUR, BEND OF THE RIVER, THE FAR COUNTRY, and THE MAN FROM LARAMIE all star James Stewart playing an embittered man who is out to fulfill a personal mission. All five Stewart roles are different characters and have different names: regardless of whether they all carry a holstered pistol.

Jedediah and the Gyro Captain are both pilots. They are also distinctly different characters (who don't even relate in the same way to Max). If you insist that they are the same man just because you recognize the same performer, you demonstrate a shallow grasp of movies.

Most great films deserve a more appreciative audience than they get.

reply

Jedediah and the Gyro Captain are both pilots. They are also distinctly different characters (who don't even relate in the same way to Max). If you insist that they are the same man just because you recognize the same performer, you demonstrate a shallow grasp of movies.
Actually, there are a couple of moments in the film which suggest a prior connection between Max and Jedediah.

Firstly, when Max first enters Bartertown, Jedediah sees him across the marketplace and smiles as if he recognises him. But he doesn't recognise him from stealing his wagon, since they never saw one another close up. Max was running far behind the wagon when Jedediah dropped from the plane, and in any case Max had his face covered.

Towards the end of the film, when Max and the kids burst into Jedediah's house, Max points at him and says "You! It's your lucky day! 'Cause you've got a plane!"

How would Max know this? As stated above, he never saw Jedediah close up, and probably never saw Jedediah Jr at all. But if confronted by an old face from the past - one who knew how to fly, and lived by ambushing and robbing people - then he might have put two and two together and figured out that the guy who ambushed him with a plane a few days back might just be the same man...

None of it's conclusive, but it leaves room for speculation.

reply

Actually, there are a couple of moments in the film which suggest a prior connection between Max and Jedediah.

Firstly, when Max first enters Bartertown, Jedediah sees him across the marketplace and smiles as if he recognises him. But he doesn't recognise him from stealing his wagon, since they never saw one another close up. Max was running far behind the wagon when Jedediah dropped from the plane, and in any case Max had his face covered.

Towards the end of the film, when Max and the kids burst into Jedediah's house, Max points at him and says "You! It's your lucky day! 'Cause you've got a plane!"

How would Max know this? As stated above, he never saw Jedediah close up, and probably never saw Jedediah Jr at all. But if confronted by an old face from the past - one who knew how to fly, and lived by ambushing and robbing people - then he might have put two and two together and figured out that the guy who ambushed him with a plane a few days back might just be the same man...

None of it's conclusive, but it leaves room for speculation.


Yep. It's clearly supposed to be the same guy. Yes, it doesn't make sense from a continuity standpoint that it's the same since at the end of 'The Road Warrior' they say that he stays and becomes their leader, but when they wrote that they probably didn't have any idea what they were going to do for the third movie. They may not even have known that they were going to make a third movie. Then, when they make the third movie, they decided to bring back the character. Maybe no one noticed the error or maybe they didn't care. One thing I've learned over the years is that filmmakers don't care nearly as much as film watchers about this kind of thing.

reply

Yep. It's clearly supposed to be the same guy.
Well, maybe not "clearly" the same guy, but there's enough there to leave it ambiguous.

Yes, it doesn't make sense from a continuity standpoint that it's the same since at the end of 'The Road Warrior' they say that he stays and becomes their leader
I've heard the theory that the Captain led the Great Northern Tribe for a few years, fathered Jedediah Jr (with the Captain's Girl) and then left the tribe and took his son back to the wasteland for some reason. Maybe he was widowed or divorced, or they were exiled. You can pretty much make up any story you want.

reply

One thing I've learned over the years is that filmmakers don't care nearly as much as film watchers about this kind of thing.


^THIS.


"Ass to ass. Ha ha ha ha. ASS TO ASS!" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oa5z77EI8y0

reply

I never see it like that, but I assume they are two different characters... maybe they are brothers/twins.

reply

All five Stewart roles are different characters and have different names: regardless of whether they all carry a holstered pistol.

Everyone in the Wild West carries a gun (to generalize) so it did not make them distinct. However both in Mad Max 2 and 3 aircraft are rare, which made the pilot character very distinct. Perhaps this explains some of the confusion.

reply

He's definitely the same character. When Max first sees him, Max turns and points right at him saying, "YOU?!" No doubt about it.

reply

Max says, "You!" because Jedidiah stole all his stuff at the start of the film. As someone already pointed out, the Gyro captain traveled far away in MM2 and became their leader...Gyro captain and Jedidiah are different characters.

reply

Let's just say there isn't very good continuity between the three movies. In particular, in the first movie there hadn't been any sort of apocalyptic war at all. Society was just in a state of decline, like "A Clockwork Orange".

reply

the apocalyptic war happened after the first movie

reply

[deleted]

I met Bruce Spence some years ago and I asked him if his two characters in Road Warrior and Beyond Thunderdome were the same character.

Bruce told me that even though the two characters were very similar to each other, they were separate characters. When Beyond Thunderdome was made, they needed someone to play the part of Jedediah, and decided Bruce was the most suitable person for the part.

Hope this clears it up.

reply

This also confused me. I was expecting a 'reunion scene' that never happened. The one where max speaks with him is very ambiguous.

In a way, the fact that's it's ambiguous if it's the same caracter or not (there are good arguments on both sides as we can see from this thread) makes the movie work also as a standalone film. I mean, if one person didn't watch The Road Warrior, he just sees the pilot as another character. If Max would recognise him and there would be a typical reunion scene, someone who would be watching the movie without having watched the others would have been a bit lost. For the ones who know the previous movies... if they want, they can interpret it as being the same character. It works both ways in a way.

Looking back at each movie, they work well as standalone movies, no need to watch the first to understand the second, etc.
And if you watch the trilogy you get the bonus of seeing the bigger character arch for Max.

But I think they should have cast a different actor, or at least make him look much more different to avoid confusion :)

reply