MovieChat Forums > Santa Claus (1985) Discussion > Was the 'Super Duper Looper' even necess...

Was the 'Super Duper Looper' even necessary to save Patch and the kid?

posted 11 years ago by acroyear7
8 replies | jump to latest

All they had to do is pull aside or under the other flying contraption and have them jump in...

[–] phantomF-12 10 years ago

It wasn't necessary, but it looked good.

[–] viscousblister 10 years ago

good point, i mean they were even underneath them when they started doing it.

viscousblister

[–] Iantjambo 10 years ago

Yes, "The sooper,dooper,looper was required to save Patch and Joe.

A reason isn't needed ok :)

[–] tortureprawn 10 years ago

I know what you mean. Just watched it and they had to fly under Patch to do the looper anyway. Seems a bit redundant.

[–] kiwikind 9 years ago

It would have actually slowed them down. I never questioned this as a kid though.

[–] hornyheather100 8 years ago

I'm still wondering why him and the girl didn't fall out

[–] residentevil6901 8 years ago

They had to do something to help out this lame excuse for a Christmas movie. What a let down the movie was.

[–] PopperTheKungFu-Dragon 8 years ago

All they had to do is pull aside or under the other flying contraption and have them jump in...

Actually even that wasn't necessary. Since they could teleport at will, he could have just teleported when he realized the car was in trouble.

That whole scene was dumb though I liked the rest of the movie. How did they even survive the explosion anyway?

Poorly Lived and Poorly Died, Poorly Buried and No One Cried