MovieChat Forums > 3 Men and a Baby (1987) Discussion > Sylvia was wrong

Sylvia was wrong

posted 10 years ago by stansmith98
4 replies | jump to latest

She just dropped the baby off not knowing if the baby would be safe and changed these guys life and not making sure the father would be there. she didnt say that she would take the baby back and she comes out of nowhere and changes these guys life again and just takes the baby like she had a right. she is the mother but she should have lost her right when she abandon her baby and wanted to take the baby to london away from these guys making it to where it would be hard to see the baby. she didnt talk about what would be best for the baby or if the father wanted to see the baby. she should be able to tell they were sad to see the baby gone. she was talking about how hard it was like they didn't know. they could have taken care of the baby without her. they should have told her to gtfo and taken her to court. she was so whiny and annoying. i was so angry at her when she came i wanted to punch her through the tv. i wish they could have had a happy moment without sylvia moving in and she gets hit by a bus or something. dont get me started on what she did in the second movie trying to take her away from the three men again and going to london where they couldn't reach her. she know for sure that they love her so much and cant live without mary. she was mainly focused on getting one of the guys to admit they love her. she was being so selfish in this movie. i wish that they could have ended the movie without sylvia with the three men and baby

[–] alexbogue3889 10 years ago

Well said.

[–] TMC-4 (19563) 5 years ago

https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/e447vx/rewatching_three_men_a_baby_and_syliva_is_a/

Shows up unannounced to reclaim the baby with no warning, thanks or gratitude for the three men who cared for her daughter, two of which were literally complete strangers.

Decides she's moving back to London so that her family can raise the child while she works in the theater.

Has a change of heart and returns to the three men, announcing that she would rather work in New York than London. But being a single actress in NYC means all her money would be spent on babysitters and so she needs someone to look after the baby for free.

Kind hearted dudes agree to basically raise her daughter for free, build Sylvia a room in their home and (I assume) allow her to live there rent and bill free while she can come and go as she pleases.

And this is a happy ending? This selfish, irresponsible, undeserving, self serving asshole hits the jackpot and we're all supposed to feel good about this?

And best of all, the sequel starts out with Sylvia eventually abandoning this dream set up so that she can follow some British prick back home to England, and takes Mary with her...again with zero regard for three men who sacrificed so much for her.

[–] orangeflava (1746) 5 years ago

Anyone got a shortened version of this?

[–] GordonGartrelle (1267) 4 years ago

Sylvia's a tool.