MovieChat Forums > Nuovo Cinema Paradiso (1990) Discussion > The original release is better than the ...

The original release is better than the Director's cut


I watched both versions and to me the original was way much better. The story kept simple but misterious because a lot of thing happened thar are left to our imagination.
The director's cut damage the ideal thought of what happened to Elena. She marries Toto's friend, that was dissapointing.
I prefer not knowing every little detail and just think that Elena and Toto's relationship is the typical love story in real life for thousands of people. Your love from teenage years is never forgotten but it's very difficult to keep forever. People grow up, change and move on with their lifes leaving towns, cities and even countries, but their nostalgic stories are always there to remind them they've changed for better or for worse.
That's my opinion. Now, want to read yours too.

reply

[deleted]

I feel the same way,the director's cut is my favourite film and after first seeing it I never wanted to go back and watch the shorter cut again! I remember the first time I saw it mnay years ago,I was already a fan of the shorter version but I couldn't believe what I was seeing with the director's cut,it was amazing,almost like watching a sequel! Such beautiful scenes and a whole pnew art of the story!

It makes me cry too especially during that car scene,which in my view is one of the greatest scenes in cimema history. When she says to him "you should never have changed your name-Salvatore" and the music kicks in,I just lose it.

I can see why some people prefer the shorter cut because of it not explaining everything and the fact that it's more about Toto and Afredo rather than Toto and Elena,but I don't think I could ever see that mutilated [in my opinion] shadow of the full version again!

reply

Definitely like the shorter cut better. I just didn't really care about Elena that much and thought the last hour dragged on so much. Does anyone have any more detail about the differences? I hadn't seen the original in over 15 years and didn't quite remember most of teh scenes anyway.

reply

I agree with you. I've seen the original release several times and today I watched the extended version. The whole romance between Salvatore and Elena has its merits but takes the focus away from Paradiso and the magic of movies and movie going. It just doesn't fit.
Not only that, but it gives a twist to Alfredo. Suddenly he's not such a great guy anymore. He becomes just a good guy with good intentions.

It dilutes the lyricism of the original with the inclusion of a love story that ultimately is banal.

I voted 9 on account of the original release. I'd give the extended version a 7.

reply

I like the directors cut because I feel it increases the depth of all characters - Alfredo included. What I like about the increased length of the final act is that we're given a LOT to juxtapose from the first half. It becomes a mirror of nostalgia vs reality, and Alfredo's warning call of "don't give into nostalgia" gets magnified. Salvatore has to give into his nostalgia to counteract the disappoint of how Giancaldo has turned out. Then, when he watches Alfredo's reel of the banned kisses at the end, the nostalgia feels even more overwhelming and transportive.

They're almost completely different films - others are right in that the first one is much more streamlined about Toto's relationship to the movies, but the directors cut increases that to show how films are an agency for nostalgia that appears to give us the ability to remember a "better," "simpler, "more romantic" life than we end up having. It becomes a film about the projection of our memories, which I think works on a many different levels apart from the original - they're both fantastic, and it's a rare instance when a director's cut actually reshapes a film and gives you the story from a different angle.

One shot is what it's all about.
-Robert De Niro, The Deer Hunter

reply

I think the idea is that if youve seen the original before the extended version, you always prefer the original. I understand that people prefer the mystery left by the original version. I didnt see the original version, but I think i would have wanted to know what happened to Elena and the reason why she never met Toto at bus station. Its just too bad to know that Alfredo was the reason they never got together. And the fact that she married that stupid classmate of the young boy Toto.

reply

The meeting between Toto and Elena at the end was not believable. It seemed tacked on and really made me question Alfredo's motives. I am glad I saw the extended version, but the only true version is the original.

reply

[deleted]

I felt that the director's cut was too long and at times silly. I don't like how things were resolved and how Alfredo was made out to be a little meddlesome. It changed the entire story for me and not for the better. The only true movie is the original for me.

reply

You people make me laugh.

"I enjoy the "original" shorter version better"

What a friggin joke. HELLO! The original version of the film is 3 hours long! That's how it was made. For european audiences that could follow plot lines and dialog.

The movie was severely dumbed down to 2 hours for the "I can't sit still for more than a minute" american crowd release.

If anyone cannot see how the search for Elena and the final 13 minute oceanside scene with her in the car adds 1,000,000 percent to the movie I feel sorry for you.

reply

I did not mind the length of the movie. I have seen much longer movies and enjoyed them very much. What I minded was the love story that just was not believable or very interesting. The comedic parts during the love story were boring and silly. The scene with Elena and Toto in the car where she explained everything was just plain dumb. Did not believe any of it. I just did not care. The most ridiculous scene was the one where Toto calls Elena and you see her silhouette in the window shade as she answers Toto's call. So silly. And also him seeing Boccia in the car with Elena at the right moment is so dumb. So, before you call people dumb for having an opinion please realize that just because someone doesn't like the same thing as you, does not make them dumb.

reply

Well I never said original version, I said original release.

reply

Just finished the international version. I can see your point of view, prohibited-name-154. If that's the case of Elena marrying someone else and not ending up with Toto, then I'm glad I saw the theatrical version over the director's cut. It is true, we lose contact with people, particularly after our teen years, but you still remember them.

reply

Modica-you've just described some of the best and most moving bits in the film!

reply

I first saw the "short" version of Cinema Paradiso in the theaters, back when I was in college. At that time in my life, that version of the movie served me very well. The scenes of the post-Army Salvatore and Alfredo were poignant but inspiring at the same time ("I don't want to hear you talk. I want to hear others talk about you.").

Fast forward twenty years, and with great trepidation I popped in the director's original version. The same notes were there, but the depth was greater, and the sadness more profound. As a full fledged adult, thinking back to my youth is mostly an exercise in idealization. The original version of the movie shows the audience that a lived life is far harder than a movie. The original version also shows us that small things have a ripple effect that aren't so apparent when they occur.

I think as a young man, the "short" was perfect. I've watched it a good number of times since college, its wistful message hitting me strongly each time. But the original version is closer to the reality that I know now. Life is about joy _and_ heartache. Things don't always turn out the way you want them to. Chance decisions set you on a path, and all of a sudden there you are. The next time I sit with the movie, I'll take the director's version, so I can be reminded of these things.

Rick (http://www.rickumali.com/) Umali

reply

I agree that the original was better. The original is what audiences first fell in love with, which go the Academy Award and became an international classic. How can you make it better than that?

I can't think of any director's cut that I though was better than the original. Often, more is less. If a director is forced to cut some scenes out of a movie, of course he is going to cut the weakest scenes. How can adding them back in be an improvement?





Forget it, Jake. It's Chinatown.

reply

It has less to do with cutting the "weakest scenes" and more to do with cutting to make a cohesive story. The scene of Elena in the car with Salvatore is beautiful, emotional and extremely well acted. In my opinion it stands out as being one of the strongest scenes in the movie. But the director chose to cut it out of the original because time limitations only allowed him to tell one side of his story. By adding them in later he was able to complete his vision.

reply

How odd! Turns out I've seen the Director's Cut! Should I go back and see the shorter, original version?

The DC I found very moving in any case. And it had a real ambivalence to it, in particular Alfredo's motives. Was he right or wrong? What I didn't get was who Elena went and married. What dumb classmate? - to be honest, I couldn't remember who that was supposed to be.

Otherwise, I found this version has a similar theme to Atonement, which also had the main character age through three versions of their life.

reply

The dumb classmate who didn't know what 5 times 5 was. The same dumb classmate that Toto beat out to get to the item Elena dropped when he first talked to her. The same guy who gave Toto the black eye. He's also the same guy that was carrying the film back and forth between the two theaters. It appears he is Toto's best friend through his adolescence. So naturally when Elena was told by Alfredo not to contact Toto, she ends up with his best friend who was there to mend her broken heart.

reply