MovieChat Forums > Dream a Little Dream (1989) Discussion > Let me tell you why this movie is so Bad

Let me tell you why this movie is so Bad


So there I was, watching this TV commercial for "Dream a Little Dream," when suddenly a light bulb went on over my head, and I said, "Hold on a minute," because the commercial shows Corey Feldman as a kid named Bobby who has all these problems in school, you know, and like he's in love with this girl but she's dating the toughest kid in the class and so, like wow, what is Bobby gonna do? After I saw this commercial, what I wanted to know was: What happened to Jason Robards? What the commercial doesn't tell you is that this kid named Bobby is not really a 16-year-old at all. He has a teenager's body, sure, but inside his head, he is occupied by Jason Robards.

Right. You got it. This is another one of those never-relenting body-and-mind-swap movies, in which an old guy winds up inside the head of a teenager, or a teenager becomes a grown up, or a father and son make a switch, or a grandfather and a grandson change places, or a dead husband is reincarnated as his daughter's boyfriend. It makes you kind of nostalgic for that movie where Chevy Chase turned into Benji.

The studio must have guessed that the public was getting just a little tired of mind-swap movies, and so in the TV commercials they simply neglect to mention the basic premise. No Robards. No mind swap.

Just a kid named Bobby with a lot of problems. This is kind of an insult for Robards, but, given the way the movie turned out, he may be just as happy not to be mentioned.

In "Dream a Little Dream," Robards is this old guy who lives near the high school. The kids are always using his yard as a shortcut, and he's always shouting at them. But basically he's a happy guy, who's in love with his wife (Piper Laurie) and enjoys philosophical talks with his neighbor. The neighbor is played by Harry Dean Stanton, who has more to lose than Robards in this movie, since "Dream a Little Dream" is a clear violation of the Stanton-Walsh Rule, which states: "No movie featuring either Harry Dean Stanton or M. Emmet Walsh in a supporting role can be altogether bad." Anyway, Robards believes that with meditation and psychic transference, he and his wife should be able to transfer their souls into younger bodies. One day Robards is knocked unconscious by a bike while meditating, and, you guessed it, exchanges personalities with Feldman. There is also some nonsense about what happens to Laurie's mind in this mix-up, and a lot of the movie is devoted to rescuing her from disappearing into the great Collective Mind, but not to worry: Eventually one of the characters reveals she was never in danger and it was all only a joke. (This particular dialogue sounds suspiciously as if it replaced an entire sequence in which Laurie was rescued.) The commercials leave out the fact that Robards is inside Feldman's body, and the movie doesn't do much with it, either. Robards, as Feldman, walks and talks exactly like Feldman, which is to say that Feldman does not act as if an old guy is inside him. In the acting sweepstakes for mind-swap movies, Judge Reinhold is still in first place for "Vice Versa," Tom Hanks is second for "Big" and Feldman is dead last.

The movie itself, to put it tactfully, is incomprehensible.

The plot is a disorganized mess, and the director, Marc Rocco, seems unable to tell even this simpleminded story with any degree of clarity.

To cover up the chaos on the screen, the movie adds the most obnoxious sound track in a long time - a group of rock songs that all sound exactly the same, even though they are played loudly. "Dream a Little Dream" is an aggressively unwatchable movie

reply

Its not unwatchable, its a classic. I admit its a movie not to be analyzed because then it wont be enjoyable. Just sit back, relax, and pretend it all makes sense. Its not so much the science of the film that makes it great, its the feel of it. The flow of the film, accompanied by the GREAT soundtrack and the themes of lost love, teenage angst, and the old man (Coleman) being able to see the world thru a young man's eyes in a different time are great. I think the movie was directed and edited better than it was written, but I for one love this flick....by the way, where did u see a commercial for this movie, and why r u basing any opinion from said commercial?

reply

Two mistakes in your post are as follows:

1- Harry Dean Stanton (Ike) is NOT his neighbour, but his close friend. The neighbour's name is Jack.

2- Robards (Coleman) is not trying to implant himself into Feldman's (Bobby) body at all. The premise is to put him and Laurie (Gena) into a perpetual dream-state in which they can live together forever in a dream. Robards (Coleman) in no way knows Feldman (Bobby)and Salenger (Lainie) will be running/biking by his home that night. Besides, why would he want to be transplanted into teenagers when he is seeking to be together FOREVER with his wife?

reply

No movie with Piper Laurie is "unwatchable". While I agree with the basic premise that body swap movies are a waste, this movie does something quite different. It's one of the best demonstrations of mature love I can think of. Laurie and Robards are perfect together, though they have too little time on screen.

This isn't Dr. Strangelove or Rebel Without a Cause. It takes an absolutely abysmal concept, focuses it through the highly stylized lens of the 80's, and adds some great talents to make a very watchable 90 minutes.

reply

Umm, next time, try citing your source Hairy-Potter -- this is Roger Ebert's review, not yours.

reply

[deleted]

I agree with the mind-swap being overused, but with the multitude of "Seventeen Again!"'s, I find this one has a quite original premise.

reply

I don't think a misleading trailer makes the movie bad. I watched this when I was younger and remembered liking it because it was darker than the John Hughes stuff. But after watching it again, it was pretty bad. Plus, I love the song "Dream A Little Dream," but they kept using the song "Young At Heart." Maybe that should have been the name of the movie. But it was like they were trying to make an 'artsy' movie. But I don't think that's possible when you have the two Corey's as your main actors.

SPOILER:




I didn't understand the ending. They had this huge buildup and then nothing happens. It just all works out in the end. That was a huge disappointment.

reply

I am in complete agreement. This movie sucked balls! Nothing made sense. The cast was pretty awesome for its time (I've never been a feldman fan), but i used to have the biggest crush on haim, until this movie showed his drug scared face! What girl didnt want to meredith salinger after this movie? She was so beautiful in this movie!

reply

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-NveVtJsvQ&lc=UghsyGK4cOtogHgCoAEC

So the premise is that Bobby (Corey Feldman) is stuck in Jason Robards' dream and Robards' personality is stuck in Feldman in the real world. In the dream sequences, first Feldman doesn't know why he's there or how to fix it. Next he wants Robards out of his life, tells him he can fix it but wont. Next, Feldman wants to stay in and at the end of the movie, it was just a joke, never happened, he was just asleep but wait everything did change. So was he just asleep, if so why did everything change?

reply