MovieChat Forums > Lock Up (1989) Discussion > IS IT A GOOD MOVIE? LOCK UP is the qui...

IS IT A GOOD MOVIE? LOCK UP is the quiet stepchild of the Sylvester St



IS IT A GOOD MOVIE?

LOCK UP is the quiet stepchild of the Sylvester Stallone cinematic family. I’d barely even heard of it before this review. Typically this kind of unawareness never bodes well for a film’s quality, which made me fear I was about to witness something along the lines of OVER THE TOP or [gulp] RHINESTONE. So color my ass surprised to discover that LOCK UP is a pretty good movie—a drama that touches you while it entertains you (and occasionally some of this touching involves punches to the face).

After its release in 1989, LOCK UP was nominated for three Razzie Awards and for the life of me I can’t figure out why. It’s nowhere near badness of that magnitude. It’s not a complex film, nor is it devoid of the occasional cheesy or saccharine spot, but LOCK UP definitely has quite a bit going for it. One is a surprisingly strong performance by Stallone. Frank Leone is your typical nice guy-badass hybrid, but he feels like a real character, not just Rocky or Rambo thrust in the slammer. On the opposing side you have Donald Sutherland’s slimy, manipulative prison warden. While Sutherland is lacking in screentime, he still creates a decidedly evil and imposing villain, a good psychological counter to the physical presence of Stallone. And in between the two leads is some nice supporting work from Tom Sizemore, ex-football star Frank McRae, and even an appearance by a young Danny Trejo.

The other thing going for LOCK UP is a willingness to tell a real story and not just have Stallone fight or shoot his way out of prison. I found the narrative engaging, with a focus on drama and character that worked more often than not (with a little help from an inspirational Bill Conti score). Perhaps that’s why the movie is so badly shunned—the only expected Stallone-esque action scenes come from a hardhitting prison football game and a quick burst at the film’s conclusion. I think if you know what to expect, you’ll find LOCK UP an underrated flick.

It also has one of the greatest one-liners ever, something that would make Bruce Campbell blush.

reply

[deleted]

Lock Up is easily one of the best Stallone movies.

Good acting by Sly, decent fight scenes and a great story. Plus the score by Bill Conti is awesome.

reply

Totally agree. One of my favorite Stallone films.

The Razzies (as usual) can go fúck themselves.

------

Wait a minute... who am I here?

reply

Wtf are u talking bout OP? Over the top is one of slya best.

Don't hunt what you can't kill!

reply

Donald Sutherland deserved his Razzie nomination. Jesus, what a loathsome ham.

reply

[deleted]

Definitely one of Sly's best films that's very underrated
and Donald is a terrific villain in it.

reply

Yeah, I like this film as well. While it's far from perfect, it certainly wasn't deserving of being nominated for several Razzies.

Sly's quite good in the lead and Sutherland's a hissable villain. I also enjoyed the supporting turns from John Amos, Frank McRae and Tom Sizemore.

7/10

reply

Yeah, I agree, it is a good movie.

I rewatched it recently, expecting only some sort of nostalgia fun, and I was very surprised when I realized it actually had a story, interesting characters, some good dialogues, and good acting, even from Stallone. There was heart, there was tension and I rooted for the characters. I really didn't expect that. Sure, it isn't more realistic than your average prison drama and looking at it now it there are clichés here and there, but overall, it's quite well done in every sense.

Its older imdb rating (5.4 in 2006) was shocking. And it did flop in 1989. I figured out it must be because it was so much different than Stallone's usual output. It didn't have many action scenes but had a lot of drama, thus it wasn't the type of movie a Stallone fan expected. So they rated it low. And those who would have wanted to see a good drama, ignored it as they thought it was just another dumb Stallone flick. And the few who rated it on its own merits has seen it somehow by accident, or could just adapt to a different style. Would it have been Robert De Niro instead of Sylvester Stallone in the main role (and once again, Sly's performance was quite good in this one), it'd be regarded as a semi-classic (if not an actual classic) now.

This movie is a proof that the "underrated" concept makes sense sometimes.

In the long run, it will gain better reputation. In the last 9 years, the imdb rating went up from 5.4 to 6.3. I hope it'll get even higher. But of course, it'll always remain somewhat hidden and never be loudly acknowledged.

reply

Good movie. Just rated it a 7.

Never let others dictate your opinion on a film:
http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=13340299

reply

I agree, I think this movie is pretty awesome!

reply

Gosh now OP has convinced me that I need to re-watch and re-rate it.

I'll admit, I AM one of those Sly fans who did initially rate it low (I gave it a 5 out of 10) because when I saw it back in the early 90s it wasn't my cup of tea. I expected Sly to do exactly what you said: shoot people up and bust out of prison. Keep in mind that just a couple of years later a vehicle originally written for Schwarzenegger called Fortress came out starring Christopher Lambert that was a bit more in line to what most people probably expected from Lock-Up.

Also, coming off huge hits in Rocky IV and Rambo III, and the release of Predator, Die Hard, and Lethal Weapon within that late 80s period, it was pretty obvious people were expecting nothing but high-end testosterone from the leading male action heroes of that era, and Lock-Up was not that kind of film.

I think the movie probably would have done a lot better following the release of the original Rocky or just before the release of Over The Top, but sandwiched in between all those high-octane ultra violent flicks, along with the burgeoning smash hits of Bloodsport and Above the Law from action-hero newcomers Jean-Claude Van Damme and Steven Seagal, and it was easy to see how poor 'ole Lock Up didn't stand a chance at the box office.

However, I haven't seen the film since the early 90s, and I don't remember much about it. So I may have to re-watch it again sometime soon and re-rate it accordingly. And given today's torrent of horrible SJW films, I've found myself re-rating a lot of 80s and 90s fare much higher these days than I originally did when I saw the films back when they came out.

reply