Collins' motive


I find a problem with this film to be that it doesn't make any real attempt to explain why the IRB (I don't even think that term was ever used, although I may be wrong) are fighting this war against Britain.

At the start we are simply told that Ireland is a British colony (technically it was a part of the United Kingdom but the people had so little say in affairs it might as well have been a colony) and then we are immediately shown the Easter Rising without any context whatsoever, not even the First World War (which is also never mentioned as far as I can remember). We are also constantly shown Irish policemen and agents working for the British government and apparently totally comfortable in their jobs, suffering no ill-effects of being ruled by Britain.

People have called this a hagiography of Collins; I argue the opposite. While Collins will remain a controversial figure and we're not going to reach a consensus here on him, I do think the film fails utterly to explain why he at least believed he was doing the right thing - a brief explanation of the crisis over the Third Home Rule Bill, Redmond's injunction that Irishmen should join the British army and the major opposition to devolution (to use a modern term) in the north would have given some much-needed context.

Box falls out of the sky, man falls out of the box, man eats fish custard.

reply

Your point is well taken, but, lest we forget, this movie is not a documentary. It is "art" (and, yes, I use the term loosely). Neil Jordan told the story he wanted to tell and, as is, that story is well over 2 hours long even with condensed action and events. Trying to add more background, context and motivation would have turned it into a 4 or 5 hour death march and even independent movies like this simply don't get made or released at that length.

reply

[deleted]