MovieChat Forums > Bean (1997) Discussion > Why Mr Bean Doesn't Translate Well To Th...

Why Mr Bean Doesn't Translate Well To The Big Screen


I find, most of the set-ups/settings for the Mr Bean TV Series' hilarious scenes, were in small scale settings, with few people about, no big crowds. The rooms or areas were often very small or closed off and he was often alone with a person or very small groups of people. The locations were often very quiet and still, enabling more focus and attention on Bean's unusual antics. There are a few exceptions, like the Christmas one with the Carolers and the Mini Golf one, but even then it wasn't that many people.

Infact the show was set in like a Mr Bean universe, a parallel setting to our universe. I think it's hard taking him out of that controlled, staged setting, because it may not work aswell, without the acute attention the TV Show places on Bean and his scenes. The bigger visual scale may distract or dilute the effectiveness of Bean antics and may not even allow the audience to observe Mr Bean more closely in his antics. In the TV Series, you would often have scenes, like when he was taking the exam for instance, where Mr Bean like goes through a process of thought or through a journey of problem solving. Up close we can notice all these nuances, his facial expression, what he is thinking, his body language and subtle gestures and movements. As part of this universe, you normally have these very plain characters who are often the receiptients or are observers of his antics, who are perfectly foiled to enhance the situation and facilitate the humour. They react often with perfect restraint and subtly within this very quiet, closed off setting.

All those subtleties seem to be lost on the big screen or conversely Atkinson may not be able refine them on the big screen.

"If anyone wants me I'll be in my room" - Lisa Simpson

reply

your point is?

i like this movie.

the tv show is better, but i dont really think it matters that the movie has more ppl in it.

_______________________________________
Thanks. I like to play.
Garth Algar

reply

The premise of my argument is I think it doesn't translate well to Big Screen and I explain why I think so. You obviously fundamentally disagree with that.

I don't simply say it's because it has more people in it, though I can see why you might interpret what I said that way. It's just the whole set up of the movie, it's altered in soo many ways from the TV series, and most aren't for the better. Part of my argument includes if fundamentally, the Mr Bean TV Series is adaptable to being a Motion Picture? I think generally no and this movie proves it.

I see the Movie and the TV Series as almost two entirely separate entities.

I just watched some of the Bean movie again. I still stand by essentially all my feelings towards the movie, I had before. The movie is practically a different entity entirely. It's barely even Mr Bean in a way. The fact the film relies on him often to do alot of talking for instance.

The film is kind of funny in parts, but just in a different way. Like his middle finger pointing episode in the car at passers by. That IS Bean mentality, but the feel and humour just plays out quite differently. I'm curious to see if others notice this too, comparing scenes from the movie, to the TV Show, it's almost starkly different, in technical, setting and atmospheric terms I guess.

I know they couldn't replicate alot of what they did on the small screen to big screen, because the scale of a motion picture is just soo much bigger. So hence my point, I think it generally can't be adapted, not to be as funny or funny in the same way.

"If anyone wants me I'll be in my room" - Lisa Simpson

reply

[deleted]

don't let yourself get distracted by this idiot who posted before me who wasn't able to think of an argument against the excellent point you make, nathm8. imo, the movie dropped a lot of what was important about bean. the tv series gave each scene more time to breathe while the movie just strung together jokes that could have been hilarious but failed to be truly funny. the pausing and great timing of the tv series had a certain kind of quality to it. the bean parallel universe you mentioned is very important, too. because of the few characters, the weirdness of bean, and the different reaction of the other characters towards bean made all scenes look separated from the rest of the world. the movie doesn't have this quality about it which is not because bean is on the bigger screen but because the producers probably felt the need to go for more mass appeal.

reply

[deleted]

It doesn't translate to the big screen because it was awful on the small screen too. I love RA in Black Adder ,it borders on genius, but the Mr Bean is so unfunny it is not true. I have tried to "get" it but I just don't. The silent comics did it before and much, oh so much, better.

reply

[deleted]

"It doesn't translate to the big screen because it was awful on the small screen too."

Total lack of logic. Even those who enjoy the series notice a difference in quality compared to the movie and that's what's the discussion is about. Your opinion on Mr. Bean in general is completely irrelevant.

reply

Yes, it is funnier on TV where he is in his own world vs. the big screen where he isn't. Also, the TV show had a laugh track, which helped.

reply

All I can say is each to their own.

reply

I found Bean the tv show to be funnier but for different reasons than nathm8 apparently does. The film for me reinforced the adage that some humor is best suited for only half-hour time slots; it is a general rule of comedy that it is difficult to sustain comedic momentum for an hour and a half or more(The Monty Python films were excellent counterexamples, however). Mr. Bean's style of humor is one of those comic styles that is better in short bursts and starts to wear thin after an hour or so. Just my opinion of course

reply

I agree with the OP, I liked this movie but it was not as good as the show, but its more of a general problem. It seems that 90% of movies based on tv shows or games are worse than their counterparts and I don't think its really about translating to the big screen.

I think the problem is that whwn they are making a movie about about a tv show/game they take everything that makes the show/game great and replaces it with stuff thats not needed

TV Show Example: 'Simpsons or Southpark' - When you don't have a good plot for a movie based on a tv show just throw in a national crisis plotline involving the shows main characters

Game Example: 'Hitman' - The whole idea of this game is to be as silent as possible but when they made it they tried to make it with more action than Die Hard and added a love story that was not needed

Thats the problem



Warp 9... engage

reply

completely agree with the Original post. Bean the movie just doesn't do it for me and for the same reasons as you.

reply

I see what you're getting at here. The actual issue is that Mr Beans overly convoluted schemes are best suited to being featured in skits. The skit based format of the show kept the jokes from going on for too long- 10 minutes is enough time to setup a situation, add some funny bits in and deliver the punch line. Helping this was that the skits were rarely interconnected, meaning that Bean could hop from one situation to the next.

Another issue is that one of the series hallmarks is that Bean is completely inconsiderate to the people surrounding him, which leads to many of his funniest schemes. The film changes this through the obligatory sentimental scene in which he chooses to revive the girl, which is completely out of character for him.



reply

I think you nailed it.
This movie is out of character on every level.

And being made about 1 character, to be out of character is unforgivable.

reply

"The skit based format of the show kept the jokes from going on for too long- 10 minutes is enough time to setup a situation, add some funny bits in and deliver the punch line."

That is very true. But I also think they took some of the jokes too far. They never showed the flying vomit in the tv series skit.

reply

Yeah , I like him better late at night and on my local public TV station .

"A man that wouldn't cheat for a poke don't want one bad enough".



reply

You're right. I loved "Mr. Bean" on television, but this movie was a huge disappointment. It just did not work.

reply

i liked it, but then again i am weird...

reply

This movie is absolutey hysterical.

reply