MovieChat Forums > Heavy Metal 2000 (2000) Discussion > Lame wannabe, falls way short

Lame wannabe, falls way short


In the age of bad sequels, bad remakes, and wannabes.....Heavy Metal 2000 ranks (reeks?) high on the crap meter. You can't hope to equal a legend, and this one falls way short of the 1981 flick. Oh, how they try to parallel some ideas, like a warlord chick who likes to fight in bars and likes to get naked, a bad guy with an elongated jaw, and a dug up green glowing light mainly because they can't think of original ideas.

Much of the nudity in this cartoon could be called "forced nudity" - where they really don't have a good reason to have it but want to add it in merely because they can. That sex-bot was totally lame, it had no place in the story other than an excuse to get nasty. The little rock alien's lines were stupid. "Ohh you're soft," he says to the femme fatale heroine. He repeats that she's soft again for those who didn't get it the first time. Great writing!! NOT!!

The villain was annoying, I'd much rather have a cool steaming Darth Vader or Rutger Hauer type than some anonymous big mouth. The warlord chick couldn't act, in fact this whole cartoon fell short on acting ability. The character animation was lame, I felt like I was watching after-school cartoons from the 90s. People just DON'T move their heads around to different positions while casually talking! It's evident throughout the movie that these second-rate animators just HAD to have movement by every living thing in every scene. Sometimes a still character works in a scene, they don't have to be gyrating all the time like they were suffering from ADD. Again, the head movements while talking - highly unnecessary! Use a head thrust to accent a strong point, not every time the subject speaks!

The backgrounds were awesome, the smoke was awesome, other than that - it wasn't groundbreaking at all. Characters walked as stiffly as they spoke. There were some in-betweens skipped in the walking anmiaton. Original HM features rotoscope in the final feature, which blows this to shame. These newer animators need to study Disney. The story itself was weak. The music sucked, and did not match what was going on in the film. The animation got tired after 30 minutes. Another reason why the original worked was because before you got enough of it, the animation was passed to a different style. Billy Idol's voice - was this done just to add some sort of 80s legitimization? I give this piece O crap wannabe a 2 of 10. Avoid this at all costs.

If you want to see a more impressive animation film with a better story and better acting, see Titan AE, also made in 2000. Heavy Metal 2000: meet Blues Brothers 2000 - at the bottom of the Wal-Mart discount bin.

reply

i agree. this movie sucks. everything from the production value to the writing. the animation sucks, the music sucks, the story sucks, the characters suck. it's just one big sucky suck fest. even the audio. all the sounds in the movie are library sounds that you hear in other tv shows and video games.

and i hate the main character; she's such a bitch about everything. she's so flat boring and angry all the time.

and these long dips to black; the hell, was this made for TV?
so i will say this-


DON NOT WATCH THIS STUPID MOVIE. IT'S NOT WORTH YOUR GOD DAMNED TIME!!!

reply

Those dips to black, ugh! I have a feeling they were aiming for tv actually. Either that or they were just useless at trasitions.

reply

I hope Kevin Eastman burns in hell for ruining this sequel just so he could showcase his trashy wife. Why couldn't they just stick to what worked, make the movie about the stories and intertwining them together with something. Possibly something NEW?!?!? I hate you Kevin. So VERY much.

reply