MovieChat Forums > Heavy Metal 2000 (2000) Discussion > Was there any REAL connection to the ori...

Was there any REAL connection to the original?


Last week the original was on, and last night I watched this one. Now I did see a scene that is similar, when the naked chick steps out of the pool and barely gets dressed.

But was there any real connection? Could this mmovie really be considered a sequel? Is Tyler supposed to be the same villian from the first, is what's her face, the hero supposed to be the little girl from the end of the original?

Spread The Fear,
Toyland Chairman
http://www.freewebs.com/demonictoys/index.htm

reply

As far as I know, there is no real connection, this is just the same style of cartoon, no sequal at all.

tHe MuRdER CaPiTaL oF thE woRLd

"walk into this world with you head up high"

reply

Its another story from the magazine. The first one was a collection of stories linked by one segment.

reply

The glowing Crystal is really the only thing that makes this a heavy metal story. Because it's the same one from Heavy metal 1. It's been said by the creators themselves.

reply

[deleted]

The only connection to the original is that Kevin Eastman, current owner and publisher of Heavy Metal and co-creator of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, was a huge fan of the magazine and movie, when he was younger. Since he made huge amounts of money from the toys, cartoons and movies based on TMNT, he bought his favorite magazine. He also scored marriage to Julie Strain, B-movie "actress" and fetish model. He turned a mediocre comic series Melting Pot, published by his own companies (Tundra and Kitchen Sink) into a vehicle for his talentless wife. The results speak for themselves. On top of it, Heavy Metal, the magazine, has been driven into the ground by Eastman. It has turned into soft-core porn, rather than a showcase for mature sci-fi, horror and erotica stories.

Yes, this sounds like a bitter old fan; but, Heavy Metal used to be a great magazine and the original movie is excellent, despite its flaws. The newer movie is juvenile beyond compare and the magazine is little more than spank material. A sad end for an improtant publication.

reply

yea the newer movie was just a way of the producer sayin "hey check out my sexy wife" the actual f.a.k.k. 2 magazine was alright....(kinda)but the movie sucked incredible anus,could've been alot better

reply

Did nobody notice the presence of the Lochnar in both movies? I'm not defending this heap of crap but there is a connection to the original classic

edit: oops, someone did. show still sucks :P

reply

Yes. The connection is that the first movie is completely ripped off in FAKK 2. Almost every plot element and quite a few of the visuals in this steaming pile are present in the original Heavy Metal. The only real difference is that it's one long boring story rather than a more or less fast-paced loosely-connected anthology.

FAKK 2 (notice how I refuse to call it "Heavy Metal"?), as my56k pointed out, was made purely as a vehicle for Kevin Eastman's wife. The problem is Julie Strain CANNOT act. She never could. This becomes painfully evident in this cartoon where she has to use some talent other than her aging softcore pornstar body to sell the "film."

reply