MovieChat Forums > The Lost World: Jurassic Park (1997) Discussion > Plot hole concerning the two islands

Plot hole concerning the two islands


In this film we discover for the first time that Hammond has in fact two islands (one where he's breeding the dinosaurs and the other for the actual park itself). He leased the first island from the government to setup a biological preserve as he explains to Grant and Sattler (which everyone else just thinks it's a holiday resort). Why did the costa rican government not become suspicious at Hammond wanting to buy two islands, not just one. They never asked the question "You've told us you want to setup a resort, so why do you need two islands?"

reply

i hate when people use the phrase "plot hole" to describe everything

reply

In my opinion the whole site b thing is a load of rubbish. I very much doubt a 2nd island was even thought of when chrichton writing the first novel, it just seems tacked on and an excuse to write a 2nd book. The first island got destroyed (including the dinos) in the novel and would have been pretty much inhospitable and also pointless to return because there would be bo dinos left to write about. Therefore chrichton had no choice but to make up another island as speilberg had already got the go ahead on the 2nd film once the novel was published.... Therefore it doesnt make sense that the 2nd island was there to breed the dinos because that was what the first island was doing. It just doesnt make sense.

reply

In my opinion the whole site b thing is a load of rubbish. I very much doubt a 2nd island was even thought of when chrichton writing the first novel, it just seems tacked on and an excuse to write a 2nd book. The first island got destroyed (including the dinos) in the novel and would have been pretty much inhospitable and also pointless to return because there would be bo dinos left to write about. Therefore chrichton had no choice but to make up another island as speilberg had already got the go ahead on the 2nd film once the novel was published.... Therefore it doesnt make sense that the 2nd island was there to breed the dinos because that was what the first island was doing. It just doesnt make sense.


After the success of Jurassic Park (the film), Spielberg and Universal asked Michael Crichton to write a second novel for them to base a sequel on.

Crichton had never before written a sequel to any of his books, and had to find a solution to resurrect the dinosaurs and have an acceptable explanation for them still being around, but hidden, despite the destruction of Isla Nublar in the first book. (The film is left open ended.)

This is how he conceived "Site B" on Isla Sorna. There never was supposed to be more than one island, and the second novel does contradict some information from the first. With Malcolm back amongst the living, The Lost World became a hybrid between a sequel to the first novel and a sequel to the first film.

As for Isla Nublar; I wrote a lengthy piece about it. If you're interested, you can find it through the link below:

http://jurassiraptor.tumblr.com/post/118621758567/what-happened-during-isla-nublars-intervening

reply

If u watch 1st movie it actually startz wid them shippin dinoz in cratez. Why ship them if they born in same island? So 2nd island makez total centz

Werd 2 ur mudda, bruddafckka

reply

They never asked the question "You've told us you want to setup a resort, so why do you need two islands?"


Who says they never asked? And who says Hammond didn't feed them some other line?

Seize the moment, 'cause tomorrow you might be dead.

reply

in the book, the island was officiallly owned by a mining company. InGen bought the mining company, and carried out their actions under the mining company's name.

reply