MovieChat Forums > Eyes Wide Shut (1999) Discussion > Naked Kidman is the only reason to watch...

Naked Kidman is the only reason to watch

posted 9 months ago by jk90us (6441)
9 replies | jump to latest

But that’s a damn good reason.

reply

[–] BKB (8909) 9 months ago

She has a great body, nice breasts.. The rest of the movie is pretty dull and feels like the only reason Tom Cruise was Cast was to prove to moviegoers at the time that he wasn't Gay..

reply

[–] daredevil1 (137) 9 months ago

Her acting is absolutely terrible, and she's not even in it that much. Not only could anybody have played her role, most anyone else would've been an improvement.

reply

[–] jk90us (6441) 9 months ago

Yes but she was A list at the time so she brought clout to the production.

reply

[–] Gd5150 (11582) 9 months ago

Nah, the party scene with all the weirdos in masks needs to be seen by everyone so they can understand what controls our political system.

reply

[–] Chickenfeet69 (81) 9 months ago

Who controls our political system? Guys in masks, and cloaks?

reply

[–] jk90us (6441) 9 months ago

I’d rather a naked Kidman did.

reply

[–] fc31 (5028) 9 months ago

But there are so many naked women in this movie, it is like a buffet of women.

You only see one?

reply

[–] jk90us (6441) 9 months ago

I prefer the ones I know vs. generic extras.

reply

[–] Melton (3443) 9 months ago

Nakidman is a bonus in an already great film.

reply