MovieChat Forums > Jeopardy! (1984) Discussion > Jeopardy! should be retired because of t...

Jeopardy! should be retired because of the proliferation of winning streaks -- or the 5-win rule should be brought back


https://newsletters.theatlantic.com/peacefield/61d920d4540050002182e1d7/it-might-be-time-to-retire-jeopardy-2/

"Jeopardy! has lost the spirit that made it an American institution," says Tom Nichols. "I am not the first to notice that the show, like other formerly amateur pursuits in America, has become professionalized and mostly closed to the casual player. It is no longer a show that celebrates the smarts of the average citizen; it is now a showcase for people who prep and practice, who enter the studio determined not to shine for a day or even a week but to beat the game itself. This, combined with the abolition back in 2003 of the long-standing rule that you must retire after five wins, has created long streaks where a few players over time crush the daylights out of the sacrificial lambs who have no real chance of beating the reigning champ without either a dash of luck or an unforced error." Nichols points out that returning champions with winning streaks have a huge advantage, having become comfortable on camera and mastering the clicker. "Watch the veterans play after they’ve won a few games. They have cracked the code, which, as paradoxical as it seems, includes completely ignoring the host," says Nichols. "The losers—again, you can watch this happen—are very focused on looking at the host, but the winners are looking at the board. They’re reading ahead, forming an answer, and waiting for the light to go on. In my best moments on the show, it was me and the board, that little light, the buzzer, and nothing else. If you’ve done all this even two or three times, new players are at an instant disadvantage. No one wants to play against a returning champ." Nichols adds: "Jeopardy! used to be a spirited, and limited, competition among ordinary Americans. Now we watch because we want to see James or Matt or Amy squash a passel of newbies every week, hapless victims for whom victory is mathematically out of reach within 20 minutes. This doesn’t reflect well on our culture. Bring in more people and make it about watching your friends and neighbors again."

reply

It reminds me of something I saw on MMO's a few times (and never want to experience again). There are groups of people (the most well-known being named "LD-50,") that will use money and pool their resources so their avatars have all the best gear and are the best-trained, and then they go into Player-vs-Player (PVP) instances in different online games and just crush the living daylights out of everyone in the area, completely sucking the fun out of the entire experience. They'll even sit in wait for the next timer to go off before devouring every other player in the area. It totally destroys all motivation for the other players (particularly the inexperienced ones, or the ones who need to do PVP as part of a quest) and makes people disgusted enough not to want to play anymore.

I'm starting to see parallels to that with all these champions. I noticed that after a while, the people running Jeopardy eventually talk to the champ and make them throw the next game in order for anybody to get another chance. I keep wondering if any of them were cheating, or if this was all a setup. Nobody is smart enough to get all the questions right long enough to win over $2 million; it's statistically impossible. And last time I checked, professional gamblers don't strike me as geniuses. My grandma thinks he was secretly cheating, and I'm starting to think so too. I'm starting to wonder if this show has been rigged and none of us was aware until the gambler showed up.

reply

I'm only in favor of long win streaks when it's a player that I like or at least can tolerate.

I got so sick of Ken Jennings constantly referring to someone who was obviously a man as "she" and as "her" that I stopped watching.

reply


Jennings didn't have a choice if he wants to keep that job or not be stripped of his Jeopardy records by not toeing the line.

I honestly don't care how anyone refers to themselves. I really don't. What they do in their private lives is fine with me as long as it hurts no one. If a guy wants to refer to himself as a woman, fine. If he wants to refer to himself as an extraterrestrial or the Tooth Fairy, I'm even OK with that. But when people are forced to refer to a dude as a "she", it just goes against my sense of right.

reply

True ( about sentence 1)

If you remember the 60s, 70s and 80s, some rock stars like to make themselves look like women. Mick Jagger, David Bowie, Boy George to name a few. No one ever called them she or her. Alice Cooper ---while looking like a mentally disturbed woman--- even used a female name.

I see I have already made this point. Oh well.

reply

Of course the big difference is that none of them made the ridiculous claim to be possessed like Linda Blair by some other entity (not a demon or Satan of course but someone of the opposite sex).

reply