MovieChat Forums > Rules of Engagement (2000) Discussion > I'm no ballistics expert, but...

I'm no ballistics expert, but...


this story seems to have one big,gaping hole in it.

OK, so the storyline revolves around who was shooting at the US Marines - the snipers from several hundred yards away or the snipers and the nearby crowd of protesters. The snipers were obviously using rifles and, as the tape showed, the protesters were firing hand guns.

All they had to do is retrieve some of the bullets to see that the majority of the shots were made by small arms.

And that would have been the evd of the movie.

reply

The crowd also had AKs. By the way, handguns and rifles are all classified as "small arms".

reply

Like I said, I don't know much about guns, but a lot of the crowd was firing pistols at the marines. Why didn't the investigators check what type of gun was being fired at the embassy?

reply

Yes, I wrote this point in my review on this board as well.

All they need to do is look at the bullet holes in the walls and also see the trajectory of the bullets.

When fired from below, several bullets would be facing upwards inside the wall.

Several bullets would be hitting near lower portion of wall (especially when held by the kids) or towards middle of wall.

Why would sniper bullets at same level end up there?

Also, several bullets would be in areas not directly accessible by the snipers on other side of street. They could've only come if you fired from directly below.

All this science and ballistics expertise in the military and none of it was even explored. What a shame.

reply

pretty sure they could have also checked the bullet holes in the marines...
from the distances the snipers were at, they would leave a distintly different hole and round than anything that was on the ground (ak's, and handguns)

reply

I thought they abandoned the embassy???

EVEN if for only a short time forensics as you mention would be impossible

reply