Um, that's not really an issue. Like the user above me said, lots of sequels take place further in time from a previous movie despite a close gap between their release dates. This movie didn't have to be set four years after Part 2 because it was made that long after it.
Now does it ruin the time setting of the first two movies? Yes, since it's clear they take place in the 1990s and Part 2 even states Part 1 happened in 1992. This movie looks like it takes place in the present so that means the first two movies now happened in the 1970s. It happens and I wish producers were more careful when making these huge time gaps with one movie that's following on from another that takes place in the present and released a short time ago. It makes it hard to place it like two decades earlier when it's obviously in the present.
But Candyman 3 doesn't specifically state it's time date so by ignoring the obvious 1990 styles in the movie's look and clothes, one could imagine it's set somewhere in 2017-2020 if they want to keep the first two movies in their present settings.
reply
share