MovieChat Forums > Gongdong gyeongbi guyeok JSA (2000) Discussion > Hmmm, don't quite get the last bit...

Hmmm, don't quite get the last bit...


Ok now i watch the movie, and i find it nice...

the only problem here is, what's up with the inconsistency in the statement of the two survivors with regards who killed the north korean private? why did the south korea survivor kill himself after he heard the investigator tell him this? and er, what's the significance of the final photo?

reply

I think he killed himself because he could not bare to live with having killed his north korean friend, in one of the final scenes you get the "mystery revealed" and you can see that he did shoot Jong-Soo.

reply

In addition to that, I think he also could not deal with the fact that he had lied and selfishly pinned the North Korean's death on his South Korean friend

reply

[deleted]

In regards to the final photo (if I'm thinking about the correct one), it's just showing a snapshop from the beginning of the film that happened to catch all four main characters (taken by a tourist visiting the JSA).

reply

The final snapshot is the one taken by an American tourist at the JSA, yes. However, there's a bit more to it.

The shot shows the four friends together, allowing us to see the triumph that they accomplished with their friendship, as well as letting the tragedy of the outcome sink in.

The only group photo is also taken right on the border: they are in their respective nations' uniforms, unable to escape from the reality of the divided Koreas.

Additionally, the photo is taken because Sergeant Oh returns the South Korean cap to the American tourist. SooHyuk attempts to block the photographer, and this summarizes the entire story of SooHyuk's actions: attempting to protect Sergeant Oh, the man who opened SooHyuk's eyes beyond that of his nationality. SooHyuk has realized that the Koreas will not tolerate this, (recall the scene where the North Korean officer Choi curses Oh for thinking he is "great because he has been abroad" --his service outside of Korea is what opened his eyes beyond his nationality) and thus in his action of blocking the photo from being taken symbolically tries to protect Oh.

The photo again is taken by an American-- there is one scene in the film where politics with America are discussed, and America has played a large role in keeping the Koreas divided. This picture allows us to see the friends for what they are, and also shows the lack of recognition of unity between the people from the American perspective.

It's a brilliant ending.

reply

I'm very impressed you were able to interpret that picture so well. Very well done.

reply

Excellent analysis.

Anyone who liked JSA, should also watch Oldboy. Another masterpiece with great visual and soundtrack.

reply

Over analysis. And why do you think she is American?

My life isn't any better than yours.

reply

I wouldn't say it's an overanalysis seeing that Park Chan-Wook is a philosophy major.

reply

It doesn't matter, whether the girl is American or not. The photographer is American. He has Chicago Bulls logo on his back. So the interpretation stands.:)

reply

great analysis to the final shot, i agree with all of it.

i just wanted to add a note about the music he employs for the shot. i think it's a perfect blend of sadness/melancholy with a sort of "lets see what we can find" playfulness that really sets the mood of the slow and meaningful panning of the camera. i also like how it starts off very softly and slowly crescendos to a nice forte when lee soo hyuk comes into the shot. really nails the emotion and meaning in the photo.

one question tho: while the timeline clearly shifts around alot, it would seem that the scene near the beginning of the movie when the photo is taken actually takes place before soo hyuk first meats sgt. oh and pvt. jun in the reed field. knowing that, it kinda diminishes the impact of that final scene. at first i read alot of meaning behind the subtle facial expressions of the 4 characters (as if they had a bond of a shared secret), but i guess that's not possible according to the timeline. and it kind of diminishes the "triumph that they accomplished with their friendship". still a great ending tho.

thoughts?

reply

Yes the picture holds a lot of information. Thanks for putting it all together.

And like you I noticed the suggestions that USA has a large role in keeping Korea divided. It’s interesting to see that in a South Korean movie. Reading the news several South Koreans don’t seem to be that happy with the US presence. Well... sorry now I’m getting a bit off topic :-)

reply

Interesting interpretation. The way I interpreted was, since the scene was in the beginning I naturally assumed that the photo was taken before they knew each other, rather coincidentally. However after reading your interpretation I believe that both interpretation could work since the movies doesn't specify the time when the photo was taken. Adding to the mystery! I love it!

But if there must be only one explanation I guess it would make more sense if they knew each other at the time for the following reasons:

a)The guy marching (North Korean - the youngest of the 4 main characters) is smiling and looking over to the South Korean side, in stark contrast to the more serious looking soldiers marching with him.

b)Sgt. Oh is smiling - very relaxed, like he doesn't have much hostility towards the South any more (presumably after realizing they're not that bad after meeting the two main South Korean soldiers.

But then, the South Korean soldiers are just doing their jobs. So maybe it could go both ways? OK, now I'm confusing myself haha.

Anyways, I think you are reading too much in to symbolism in the photo. Afterall, it does look like everybody is just doing what they're suppose to do. You actually aren't allowed to take photos there except when permitted. I believe its just meant to evoke an emotion of further tragedy since it looks back at a time when they were naive, but happy. This sad but happy ending is incredibly powerful and somehow manages to summarize the entire movie in a single scene. The same raw emotion I felt at the end in Oldboy when Oh Daesu is laughing/crying. I almost want to fantasize that this was a true story and that picture is somewhere in someone's attic - a trivial piece of memorabilia stashed away with a forgotten tale. I almost want to believe that it exists because the story of the film was so real.

Sorry, went off on a tangent. Regarding your mentioning of anti-Americanism in the film, I did see the scene where the North Korean Sgt Oh says that the Americans divided the nation, and that the Americans should leave so they can unite the nation. Well, it is anti-American but you have no option to accept it. They DID play a role in dividing the country. Plus, the North Koreans are basically brain washed to believe the Americans rape and pillage. At any rate, nobody should be upset at such a small comment. We have the worlds largest economy, military, and political power in the world, Let people have fun poking fun at us. I'm sure being a recently industrialized nation is intimidated by such a global power, so why can't we just take it in good humor? Who says the US doesn't have flaws? There's some kind of over-compensation going on with the I-can't-take-criticism of some Americans.

reply

I definately believe the final photo embodies my main beef with the film - its pro-unification agenda overrides everything else about it. The South Korean soldiers are so cross and, essentially, censoring the dumb American tourist, while over on the North Korean side are all, without fail, smiling. We are led to believe that the North Koreans are the ones who are censored (especially us Americans) and the South Koreans who are the truly happy ones, so I believe this final scene is supposed to contrast that. The whole movie seems to be trying to turn on its head the South Korean perception that North Koreans are dumb, ignorant, would come to ROK if they could (counteracted by Oh's direct refusal of a request to do the same) and provincialism (Oh has been all across the world, although now inexpicably stuck at a border station). Being filmed at the heart of the beginning of the Sunshine Policy, I understand the historical context... but this film does try just a little bit too hard to portray the North Koreans as polite and benign.

reply

[deleted]

I think it was an automatic action like he had been trained to do. A bit like where he was shooting at targets.

Looking back at it. It was probably a blur to him. So he did not remember killing his friend. At the end when he realised, he was overcome by guilt.

reply

i just think that the last scene shows the tense relationship between north and south korea. every wrong action by accident or not can have fatal consequences (suicide).

reply

By the same director of Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance and Oldboy; so, even in this politically-charged situation called JSA, he presents something about the individuals, just like Mark Renton betrayed his trainspotting friends! Of course I'm kidding.

reply

Soo-hyeok shot Private Jeong Woo-jin. He lied to Sophie E. Jean and blamed the death of Jeong on Private Nam Sung-shik because he was ashamed of himself.

In fact, not only was he first to shoot Jeong (Sophie had only implied it might've been that he was just faster on the trigger) but he was also the one who unloaded his clip into his corpse.

Further, when you see Soo-hyeok point the gun at Sgt. Oh Kyeong-pil and pull the trigger multiple times with no effect, it all makes sense. His gun is empty because he did all the shooting. In fact, he would've shot both his North Korean friends had he not run out of ammunition.

The only shot Private Nam had fired (i think) was one that had missed Jeong and hit the casette player instead. (which Sgt Oh had gottan rid of)

I'd have to watch the scene again, but I think its debateable whether Jeong shot Soo-hyeok in the leg before or AFTER (simultaneously perhaps) Soo-hyeok had pointed the gun at him (subsequently shooting him in the head).

So it could very well be that Soo-hyeok killed and tried to kill all three of the North Korean soldiers with Private Nam only firing one shot that missed.

Why did he kill himself? For the same reason he almost confessed during the meeting between both sides with Sophie. Guilt.

As Sgt Oh had said, speed isnt important, its composure and courage... and Soo-hyeok seemed to have acted spuriously and uncontrollably out of fear.


reply

I think you're wrong about the part when we see Soo-Hyeok point hi gun at Sgt. Oh. He didn't actually point his gun at Sgt. Oh, it was in fact Private Nam that had. If you remember earlier, Sophie mentioned that Nam's gun had jammed and that's why he only got one bullet out. So, if not for his gun jamming, Sgt Oh would be dead. When Soo-Hyeok tells his story, he switches his position with Private Nam.

reply

[deleted]

Alright lets think about this.If you noticed you can see the bullet jammed in lee's gun so he can't have done the shooting. when sgt. oh gives the guns back which one does he give to nam? SGT.LEE'S!!!!! Nam kicks lee's over to the body and drops his own.. So nam did do the shooting and the only reason sgt. oh is alive is because of the jam. THEY ACCIDENTALLY SWAPPED GUNS!!! sgt. lee shot jeong in THE HAND but wait, wasn't Sgt.lee very fast with a gun? it is sending the fact that no-one knows who shot who. And it doesn't really matter. It's not the actions you should be focusing on it's what they symbolise.

this leads to the corridor of uncertainty your continously walking down. The ending relates to the girls father. He REFUSED BOTH sides. If you watched the behind the scenes you will have learnt that sgt.lee was a scapegoat, he realised what he had been fighting for was the same as what he was fighting against. realising the death of his south korean friend was his fear to question his position and that of others and to find out where he belongs. Ultimately causing him to commit suicide.


And also I am only 12 (using my dads pc) so if you could'nt not understand it as well as I did then wow.Anyway I think only the director knows, so if you bump into him give us a shout

reply

[deleted]



I saw this last night. I also was confused by at what actually happened. I attributed it to my not really being able to understand how/why the hate is so intense between the North and South Korean soldiers. At first I couldn't understand what the big deal was about them being friendly. I read each of the above posts and said, oh, thats it after almost each one. Because each one is plausible. Hard to tell cause they are all just based on an individual's corruptable memory. I think the director has perhaps purposely left it somewhat vague because "who did what" is not the critical point of the movie, but rather the impact that the division has had on the individuals (as a symbol for society as a whole).

Very thought provoking. What a horrible pressure to have to live under.

reply

Dear Nanchan,

I'd like to help you enjoy this excellent film a bit more, so here's my description of the reasons behind North and South Korean hatred.

The whole of Korea (united, at the time) was invaded by Japan in 1910. The Japanese stayed until the end of World War II and behaved cruelly towards the local population. The Korean language was publicly banned, Koreans were all given Japanese names and when World War II broke out, Koreans were forcibly drafted into the Japanese Imperial Army. Thousands of Korean women were also abducted from their homes and sent to the front to serve as sex slaves for Japanese soldiers (Japan still has great difficulty admitting to this).

In 1945, when Japan was defeated, the same sort of "liberation race" that had taken place between the US and the Soviet Union in Europe happened in Korea. The Americans ended up liberating the south and the Russians the north. In preparation to restore an independent government in Korea, each side administered their own side during the post-war interim period. It was agreed that nationwide elections would be held in 1948.

But they never happened. North and South Korea disagree very strongly on who reneged on their promise first, but the offshoot was that North Korea ended up "electing" its own separate government, based in Pyongyang. South Korea followed shortly afterwards from Seoul. In any case, both elections were rigged. In the North the Korean Workers Party headed by Kim Il-sung took power with the support of the Soviet Union, and in the South the Americans deliberately appointed a puppet regime headed by Syngman Rhee, a borderline fascist right-winger and fierce anti-Communist. Both sides of the newly divided country looked at each other with hostility and distrust. Something had to give, and a few years later it did.

In June 1950 North Korea (with Stalin's approval) crossed the 38th parallel which unofficially divided the two countries and launched a massive invasion of the South. Southern forces were routed and the country was quickly overrun. The United Nations (at the initiative of the US) responded swiftly and this became known in the West as the Korean War. Headed by General McArthur, the mostly American forces launched a brilliant surprise counter-offensive and managed to roll back the North Koreans all the way across the border. Dizzy with his success, McArthur surmised that he could also topple the North Korean regime in the bargain (in contravention of President Truman's orders) and kept heading north, with the result that American troops ended up dangerously close to the Chinese border. It is not known whether McArthur wanted to actually try to overthrow the newly-established Communist regime in China as well. Certainly, he failed to ever take the Chinese seriously and never for one second accepted that the Chinese Communists were a legitimate government with wide popular support - which they were.

In November, Chinese troops poured over the border into North Korea, officially in assistance to their Communist neighbours but also to repel what they saw as a threat to their own security. Through a combination of sacrificial offensives and imaginative guerrilla tactics, the Chinese managed to push the American army back over the border once again. The war lasted for another three years but no one made any significant gains (Seoul, for instance, suffered enormously because it kept being captured by one side or the other). During this time the US indiscriminately bombed the whole of North Korea, resulting in hundreds of thousands of civilian deaths. Negotiations started in 1953 to try and end this stalemate and it was finally agreed that a "ceasefire line" would be drawn between the two countries based on the current location of the frontline (which ironically was almost exactly around the 38th parallel - back to square one). Thus the war effectively ended. But it is important to note that THIS WAS ONLY A CEASEFIRE, NOT A PEACE TREATY: the two Koreas remain officially at war TO THIS DAY, and neither side recognises the other's government.

With the war ended, both Koreas went their respective ways. A demilitarised zone (DMZ) was established around the ceasefire line and it is still the world's most heavily defended border. The DMZ is 4 kilometres wide with an electrified fence in the middle. The entire territory is heavily mined - the reason why the US never signed the Comprehensive Mine-Ban Treaty, indeed, is that this would have forced them to withdraw their mines from the Korean DMZ. Both North and South Korea patrol their own side of the DMZ relentlessly, day and night. In the middle of the DMZ, the village of Panmunjom, where the ceasefire negotiations took place and discussions between the governments still occur, was made into a Joint Security Area. The border runs right in the middle of the negotiation barracks and each delegation sits on their side of the table. I have been to the JSA and can attest that the film's depiction of it is completely accurate.

Both Koreas, still being officially at war, remained hostile to each other and continued to try and undermine each other's government at every opportunity, sending spies and agitators over to the other side and getting into occasional military skirmishes - I knew a South Korean guy handpicked during his military service to serve as a special undercover commando into the north, and he was the only one in his platoon to make it back alive. The North Koreans also dug several infiltration tunnels into the south, and attempted several times to assassinate South Korean government figures. Both Koreas remained dictatorships, each supported by their respective superpower - the US cared little that South Korea was not democratic so long as it was reliably anti-Communist. Even today, all South Korean males have to serve in the military for 3 years and 37,000 American troops are stationed in a huge base in the middle of Seoul (which is only an hour's drive away from the border) to deter any further North Korean attacks.

South Korea developed and eventually democratised in 1988, but North Korea stayed staunchly Communist and totalitarian, and remains so today. In fact it has reacted to the end of the Soviet Union and the collapse of most Communist regimes by shutting itself in even more, and today it is arguably the world's most closed up country. Norh Koreans are of course not allowed to move abroad. As for foreigners, the only ones in North Korea are diplomats from a handful of countries and officials from aid agencies. North Korea very occasionally issues tourist visas but during their stay these rare visitors to the "hermit kingdom" are accompanied by two government guides at all times, they are not allowed to go wandering on their own and their every action is monitored by the security services. The country is permanently geared to a high level of paranoia, and society is heavily militarised - the only ones nowadays who can expect to always eat properly are soldiers.

At the time of the Korean war, the North was in far better shape than the South. It had a larger and much better educated population, all the industrial infrastructures and a large portion of the country's natural resources. The South, by contrast, had always been considered as Korea's rural hinterland, its population was far poorer and most of the territory's economic existence relied on subsistence farming. But as South Korea adjusted to market economics and adopted a series of intelligent strategic measures to become globally competitive, the scales were gradually tipped. North Korea sank into slow ruin because it stuck to an unrealistic state-planned economy. The collapse of the Soviet Union also dealt North Korea a huge blow since it meant the end of considerable financial aid and subsidies. Starting in 1994, a series of famines struck the country and it is estimated that hundreds of thousands have died since then. Made desperate, thousands of North Koreans have braved danger and death to sneak across the border into China (naturally, escaping directly to South Korea through the DMZ is not an option!). Nowadays, the North Korean economy is only barely kept alive by virtually free prison labour (up to 200,000 people are estimated to be locked up in labour camps throughout the country), the occasional financial aid provided by friendly countries and international agencies, remittances sent to relatives by ethnic Koreans in Japan (most settled there for generations) which are then embezzled by the authorities, and the black market.

North Koreans are subjected to an endless stream of propaganda by their state-controlled media - those North Koreans who are caught with clandestine wireless sets trying to eavesdrop on South Korean radio stations can expect to be sent to labour camp, possibly along with their families. The North Koreans therefore believe that it was the US who struck first in the Korean War, not the North (North Koreans refer to the Korean War as the "fatherland liberation war"). They are taught that the South is nothing but a puppet regime of the United States (which, to be fair, it originally was) and that the US could attack them again at a moment's notice. The North Korean media seemingly only broadcasts reports on four distinct topics (to see some samples of these often tragically hilarious soundbites, you can visit the official North Korean news agency at www.kcna.co.jp, possibly the only North Korean-run website in existence):

1. How the US is an evil imperialist force trying to divide the people of Korea;

2. How the South is a despicable stooge of the US and its citizens are continually misled and oppressed;

3. How Japan is a puppet of US imperialism bent on recolonising Korea; (both Koreas harbour a strong resentment against Japan for their horrific treatment of Koreans during their 35-year annexation of the country, but North Korea is much more fixated on it, possibly because resistance to Japan was always more intense and organised in the north, and this gives North Korea another reason for claiming it to be the "true" patriotic Korea)

4. How Great Leader Kim Il-sung and Dear Leader Kim Jong-il are the Light of all Humanity on this planet and every world leader wants to pay respects to them.

In particular, the cult of personality engineered around the personalities of Kim Il-sung and Kim Jong-il (his son) is extraordinary in North Korea, and transcends even the ones in other bombastic Communist states like Maoist China, Stalinist Russia or Cuba. Everyone has a portrait of either one or both leaders in their home and Kim Il-sung has been made president for "all eternity" even though he has been dead for 12 years now. As years passed and totalitarianism tightened, the two Kims were credited with more and more extraordinary achievements and inventions - just like the Party's claims to have invented the helicopter and then the aeroplane in George Orwell's "Nineteen Eighty-Four". It is now claimed, for instance, that Kim Il-sung defeated Japan almost single-handedly: no mention is made of the US's central role in the Pacific War, nor of the atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki - North Korea would of course never want to incite the slightest measure of sympathy towards the Japanese, nor hint that it had ever been anything but a US ally. Nowadays Kim Jong-il is said to have been born at the top of Mount Paektu, coincidentally the birthplace of the Korean people according to traditional mythology, whereas all evidence indicates that he was actually born in the Russian town of Khabarovsk. The state-controlled media insist that "brilliant white horses" and other angelic figures were seen in the sky at the time of his birth.

I hope I've helped in showing you why North and South Koreans still have a strong animosity towards each other. Both want reunification, but neither recognises the other officially (maps printed in both South and North show all of Korea without hinting that any border exists between the two). Reunification may yet take a while: no one is innocent in the tragic history of this country.

Cheers,

Cedric

reply

One minor correction to the above post. Today there are about 33,000 American military in Korea, and they are spread across the peninsula, mostly along the DMZ in the 2nd Infantry Division. The big base is Seoul is the US Forces in Korea HQ and well as the Combined Forces Command HQ and it has only about 7,000 American military.

Joe

reply

To Cedric,
Thank you for your post. I found it extremely interesting, filled in a lot of gaps, and led me to do a bit more research on Korea.
Thank you for being insightful an posting your knowledge for us to read and learn from.

Sofox

reply


Cedric - do you contribute to the wikipedia ? If not you should ! thats some history you gave us there.. after such a brilliant movie ..this post of yours has to be one of best posts I have read in recent times.. kudos to you and to IMDB and to the internet lol ..

If you may allow me I would want to add this to the wikipedia (if its not already there)

I wonder how many countries have the americans/russians *beep* in the pursuit of being the greatest superpower .. sad sad sad ..

I don't drive fast, I just fly low.

reply

yeah, it makes you think twice about how much the world hates America, and if that hate might be somewhat justified.

One poster above suggests a recently industrialized country is poking fun of American power since America is so great...but after reading an earlier post about how America indiscriminately bombed north Korea killing hundreds of thousands of people, can you not see how North Korea might harbor a grudge against them? I know NOW, its run by a dictatorship, who likely don't care about the past and mainly want to remain in power by exploiting their own country, but I can see how extreme resentment to America would occur.

Same thing happens in, say Iraq or Afghanistan, and we've got hundreds, thousands, tens of thousands, or even hundreds of thousands of civilian casualties, can you imagine the number of suicide bombers who want to destroy America? I'm always amazed "all" they have done so far is the 9/11 attacks, while they were truly horrendous, it is nowhere near the damage mass coordinated suicide bombers could do.

It's barely even been one generation since the Korean War, and Iraq/Afghanistan is fresh in everyone's mind...I wonder what's in store for our generation, will we be victim to the mistakes of the past, or will we commit more of the same atrocities to each other.

reply

I'd add one small observation.

At the conclusion, when Major Jean witnesses Sgt. Lee's suicide, she is receiving a final lesson in "diplomacy," and why a good diplomat has no problem with skirting the truth, a quality totally inconsistent with her personality.

The film woos the audience to Major Jean's side -- we all wish to see her resolve the mystery and bring everything to resolution, so the failure that springs from her "success" becomes our own.

Lee's suicide also narrows responsibility for the incident; it is ultimately the individual who decides who is their enemy. Sgt. Oh successfully made his own distinctions, despite his communist loyalties, whereas Lee failed to do so.

reply

Excellent observation aka-ed. I never thought of that. That ties in well with Park's later films.

Most Recent film I've seen:
Othello (1952) by Orson Welles 8/10

reply

What a brilliant, great film.

reply

may I just add a question here? I'll do it anyway

<.<

>.>





Ok, so the two south koreans switched. but does that end when they leave the post and run for the bridge?

Because I just saw it and I thought that Nam's personality really showed in how he was able to instantly shoot his friend and abandon his wounded friend who helped and took him in when he was very alone.

Didn't anyone else think that? I found it very plausible that Nam would be the shooter seeing who he treats the other SK on the bridge...

But overall I do agree with the common statement in this thread. I really like this director. It's a shame I have a serious problem remembering Asian names ;\ I have trouble keeping characters apart by names, if they seem similar.

Wonder if Asians have the same problem with western names...

reply

First off let me say that I find this film excellent, even more so when you watch it with knowledge about the south and the north korean divide.

Although the bullet count is not much of a concern to the point of the film, I have my own theories and find that bmkchu's interpretation couldn't hold. Watch the film again and you'll realise it's impossible for the Sgt Lee's and Pvt Nam's role to switch during the shooting. This is because the investigations showed that the gun that fired 10 shots came from Pvt Nam's gun and the gun that jammed was Sgt Lee's. Somehow, the guns switched hands. So, my theory is this, everything that is shown during Sgt Lee's confession did happened that way (because that explains the guns changing hands), except when Pvt Jung lifted his gun after the lieutenant was shot, Sgt Lee was the first to react to that and shot him in the head (he was fast with a gun and a good shot remember?), his gun jammed there and then. Pvt Nam then shot the finger off (guess he wasn't that good), and when he saw Sgt Lee being shot in the leg, he snapped and unloaded into Pvt Jung's body. This is also consistent with Major Jean's statement about who fired a second earlier is not important, meaning only those 2 shots were switched, and it was Sgt Lee's headshot that killed Pvt Jung. Also note that Major Jean never said that Sgt Oh's testimony states that Sgt Lee killed both, in fact, it was Sgt Oh who dealt the killing shot to the lieutenant (with Pvt Nam's gun of course...)

reply

[deleted]

It's implausible and out of scope to assume that the guns were switched when the film never suggests that at all

Watch the film again. Right before Pvt Nam jumps out of the window, Major Jean said that everyone assumed the gun Sgt Lee was holding when he was rescued was his, but a check on the registration number reveals it to be Pvt Nam's. The scene before Lee's suicide only showed him shooting Jung in the head, nothing more nothing less. That's how I came to my conclusion of him making that one and only shot possible since his gun fired only once and jammed.

There is a fine line between inference using the given scenario and making things up to make a theory work.

I'm not making up anything. It's as possible a scenario as the one given by you, bmkchu. In fact I find my theory makes more sense given the few scenes I've quoted. But it's a confusing film at times and any of us may be wrong. That's not the point of the film though, just wanted to spill out what I think.

reply

I agree with tensai700 on this one!!

bmkchu mate you clearly need to brush up on your observational skills!!! The NKorean captain was clearly going for his RADIO and not his gun, this is confirmed for me by the fact you see his radio hit the floor seconds after he had been shot!!

Another Quality Korean Film, keep them coming guys :-)

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

I thought that the secondary south character did indeed do the shooting, but the primary north character told the nuetrals that the primary south character did to make him seem like a hero. It was a friend thing, even after his 'friend' tried to kill him. But I could definitely be wrong.

reply