Well, it's the old 'ugly hag looks better when accompanied with even uglier hag'-syndrome, except with men and charisma (status, etc.)
Charlie doesn't really need Alan for anything (what does Alan really give Charlie, except stress, when you think about it?), but he gets used to how he can utilize Alan in many ways.
Compared to Alan, Charlie looks even more alpha, and Alan is always a good butt of a joke, which makes it easy to see how much better Charlie's own life is compared to Alan's misery.
No matter what kind of hangover Charlie is suffering from, seeing that Alan's life is always worse, gives Charlie the useful contrast he can use to alleviate his possible guilt or other bad feelings.
There's also the 'provider' aspect of the whole situation; Charlie can feel like a grand benefactor, when he lets Alan mooch off of him so much. He can then use this as leverage, whenever he wants.
So although it's not REALLY 'co-dependency', as Charlie doesn't really need Alan for anything, from Charlie's point of view, it's always nice to have someone to show off to, someone that envies you, someone that you can compare yourself to favourably (for you), and someone to use in all these psychological ways I described in this post.
Being brothers, of course there's sometimes even real 'comradery' (camaraderie?), and opportunities for Charlie to show that he's not completely heartless, as he does help Alan quite a lot.
I don't think Charlie was ever any 'lonely golden boy' (whatever THAT means), but more like 'a man doing whatever he wants, with lots and lots of attractive company around'.
People are trying to put down Charlie, but when you think about the first season's Charlie, you can realize this is most likely just envy - what man wouldn't want to do whatever he wants, and life a life based on freedom and his own, chosen path, just the way Charlie Harper does / has / did?
The cat is out of the bag, and the marriage scam is dying. Good riddance! Freedom FTW!
reply
share