anyone else surprised
that this movie has a 6.2 out of 10 on IMDB? I would think that the rating would be lower, something like a 5.4 out of 10 or something like that.
share6.2 is probably fair. It's only really a bad film in comparison to the first two. It is a big step down. But objectively it's not a bad film. There is a fair bit of bad stuff in it. But there is some good stuff too. It's a mixed bag. It's got more going for it than that intensely boring Andrew Garfield one that followed it.
share