MovieChat Forums > Inside Man (2006) Discussion > Silly part that was just as simple to do...

Silly part that was just as simple to do correctly:

posted 10 years ago by BeanieBabyProfits
3 replies | jump to latest

Not that I am mad because you get to see the attractive females in their underroos but come on.

They write a scene in which all the women in a line are instructed to remove their clothes; before they even start undressing my immediate thought is to scrutinize the practicality of the scene if they are all attractive. I don't even need to be watching to think right off the bat, "I bet they are all attractive."

Sure enough they are and I liked it. But, for crying out loud it's just silly. Either it's the dumbest, self-initiated ploy to work in a few cute girls for the viewer or they are choosing to take out the reality of the situation.

Unless a bank is hosting a models' convention on this day there is no way you see that many attractive women in a bank at one time like that. Especially ones that are all wearing matching, attractive under garments.

I like this movie, like the eye candy but that was just stupid. Removed a bit of the authenticity to real life and lost some credibility as no director is dumb enough to have just "missed" that.

The end.

[–] member-id 10 years ago

Yeah, cause the director does the casting for non-speaking extras in a movie(blame the casting directors and producers). Also, the men didn't look like most of the guys at my bank either. Do you know how many movies do the same thing (almost all of them), I've never been bothered by it, its just a given that most of the extras in a bigger budget movie are good looking(or really ugly, depending on what its for).

[–] jordywalnuts 9 years ago

First, they all weren't attractive, not even close. 3 or 4 were decent maybe. But it's also important to understand that in NYC, there is a far greater ratio of attractive women.

[–] KGroovin (1) 2 years ago

who was the best looking hostage.