P&R was good for season 2, and that was about it. I thought I would like season 4, but I just couldn't finish it. There were too many useless characters, and they weighed the show down. I'm glad that Amy Poehler is a Democrat, but that doesn't make the way that Jerry's character was mentally abused any funnier. Neither does the fact that Jim O'Heir enjoyed it. Tom was a superficial jerk. Andy was a moron. April was a brat.
Ron was the only character worth watching. And maybe, given the way MNIE ended, P&R deserves some credit for the fact that every season finale "could have served as a series finale." But, can you honestly say that you prefer a show (P&R) that tells us that people in small towns are stupid over a show (MNIE) that told us that all people, specifically those in small towns, deserve respect?
It is unfortunate that Amy Poehler's most honored work (P&R, "Inside Out") involves her being a bully. Is that what you mean by "empowered"? She bullied Jerry, but she didn't seem so "empowered" when she was dealing with anyone else, did she? Was she "empowered" when she dealt with April? With Ron? With Tom? With Andy? With the towns' people? No, it seemed limited to Jerry. Ditto with Tina Fey's Liz Lemon and Don Lutz. In Poehler's defense, the climax of "Inside Out" did occur when her character realized that the character that she was bullying actually had some worth after all, but I don't think that Poehler had anything to do with the writing of that film.
Community had a good twist in the season 1 finale w Jeff + Annie, but they couldn't decide what to do with it. They tried backing over it, but then they went back to it in the alternate timeline episode. Then, they went back to that one. And they did a bunch of parodies. Hey, look, it's "The Muppets". "GI JOE". "Goodfellas". And, I've forgotten the rest. Oh, yeah, they were also "empowered" when they were bullying "Pierce". But they didn't seem so "empowered" with Abed. It's hard to call that "quality".
reply
share