MovieChat Forums > 28 Weeks Later (2007) Discussion > The military was right; the protagonists...

The military was right; the protagonists should have been shot


Perhaps some my find this interpretation controversial, but it's clear that the Tammy and Andy were at fault for all of this.

Though understandable that they would want to return to see their home, the discovery of their mother after bending the military containment rules set the plot on the path to hell.

General Stone was correct to have put on a code red, even killing potentially innocent civilians given the threat and what was known about the virus: It's immmediate and deadly spread, and the constant threat of it crossing the English Channel. There is no doubt anyhow that the procedural policy was decided by higher echelons. He was only there to judge when/if it should be put into place.

Doyle was wrong to have asked his comrade to bring them across the Channel as the film clearly implies that this is what brought the French outbreak.

The lesson of the movie? Perhaps that individual wants and moral calls can be an anathematic to the collective result.

The other though provoking side of the movies is exactly this question of responsibility, and the viewer wrestles with it from the beginning. What would you have done in Don's shoes? In the soldiers' shoes? In those of Tammy and Andy? In those of the pilot that makes the fateful flight across the channel?

Excellent movie. 9/10

reply

I agree.The virus had been contained and the infected died off.There are no bending rules in this situation.Disobey the rules and get shot.
It's only a movie but can you imagine the whole world becoming infected because of a couple of naive kids?

reply

"What would you have done in Don's shoes? In the soldiers' shoes? In those of Tammy and Andy? In those of the pilot that makes the fateful flight across the channel?"

I can tell you what I would have done in the soldier's shoes, namely the snipers' (Doyle). As soon as I'd seen them kids through my scope, I'd have pulled the trigger... when they escaped in the beginning AND again later during the 2nd outbreak while he was positioned on the roof.

Problem solved.

Kids or not, it doesn't matter. Daddy should have explained the rules better.

reply

The kids were arguably not in the wrong. Had they not bended the rules and gone to their home, their mother would never have been discovered. But she was and with her the possibility of a cure.

The one who truly set the plot on the path to hell was the father. He circumvented all kinds of security and protocol to see his detained wife. Had he either asked for proper permission or simply not gone to her at all, he would've eventually learned that she was a carrier and he would have (presumably) never been infected by her.

reply