MovieChat Forums > Juno (2007) Discussion > Why do they treat teenage pregnancies sh...

Why do they treat teenage pregnancies shocking when it's really common?


I mean Juno and her parents treat it as really really bad, which it is, but it's not that unusual. She is suppose to be 16, I think, but when I was in school three girls got pregnant that I knew who were 13, and one got pregnant at 11.

So to be pregnant at 16 is really nothing and I bet most parents wouldn't even be surprised if that happened to their daughter. Especially when so many kids are sexually active, so why is it that this movie treats it like it's an abomination?

I think the movie may have been more effective, if they made Juno 13 years old, because then it's less common, more shocking and more of an abomination to the parents and other characters.

What do you think?

reply

Although you make the valid point that pregnancy has unfortuneately become more common in teens, it is still a shocking thing for a parent to hear about their daughter. No parent want their kid or family to go through the embarrassment of the situation. Not that people should be outed for that, but less understanding people are likely to look at teens like that with disdain and act like they're irresponsible and unintelligent. So I do think Juno's parents reaction seems fitting.

reply

Although you make the valid point that pregnancy has unfortuneately become more common in teens,


That is inaccurate. Teenage pregnancy rates are lower now than they were in the 2000's. In the 2000's they were lower than they were in the 1990's, etc etc.

reply

Agreed. No one wants or expects it to happen to their kid. I think parents like them hope their kids aren't having sex or doing drugs, hence when Bren says "I didn't even know you were sexually active." If she'd known about Juno having sex she wouldn't have been as shocked.

reply

It's not more common in teens. The rate has been going down for some time. The OP is out to lunch.

reply

Rynoll, it's always unusual when it happens to YOUR kid.

reply

That's true, but I still feel the movie is trying to make an important statement about society that is behind it's time. I was watching For Keeps (1988), which is the same thing, but it came out almost 20 years earlier, and I felt that it dealt with teen pregnancy more profoundly.

reply

Fact: Teen pregnancy is lower now than it's been in the last several decades. You don't know what you are talking about.

reply

I think you should have done some research before posting to avoid being wrong. My five seconds of research led to the link below:

http://www.childtrends.org/?indicators=teen-pregnancy


reply

I didn't see the treatment as shocking. In fact, it seemed to me that all the characters dealt with it in a pretty matter-of-fact manner. Yes, people react, but mostly they react by doing something. And of course time is compressed -- we see a year go by in an hour and a half -- so we see a lot of the actions and reactions and none of the normal life going on in between.

Where exactly did you think it was treated as shocking?

Edward

reply

Premarital sex and teenage pregnancies may be common in the USA, that does not make them good or desirable. Mass murder and suicides are also common, I doubt you would work so hard to justify them. Juno's behaviour was immoral, simple as that.

reply

Nope

reply

Because it usually means that the mom and the kids live in poverty.

reply

Teenage pregnancy may be common, but it's usually unplanned; that situation, as used for a cinematic premise, makes for built-in drama. "Knocked Up", for example, revolves around a grown woman dealing with an unplanned pregnancy, and found enough plot to with for an entire movie.

reply

It's not "common". It's probably less than 10% that get pregnant before 20.

reply

Funnily enough, this film is often criticized for potraying teen pregancy as little more than an incovenience.

_______
The sun is shining... but the ice is slippery.

reply