MovieChat Forums > Jumper (2008) Discussion > Good movie but Jamie Bell was awful

Good movie but Jamie Bell was awful

posted 8 years ago by stormhappy106
5 replies | jump to latest

Hayden was fine in this imaginative film, but Jamie Bell was such an obnoxious prick that he almost ruined the movie

[–] 8 years ago

[deleted]

[–] threes2013 8 years ago

I thought he was the best part of the movie.
Anyway movie should have been so much better.

[–] angrygemini 8 years ago

Me too, Jamie was good as a prick, Hayden mumbled and "acted" every scene phoning it in mostly. So its a joke to say Hayden was okay, he was just there taking up space.

[–] inter_tayne012 8 years ago

Hayden was fine in this imaginative film, but Jamie Bell was such an obnoxious prick that he almost ruined the movie

Uh.......for me, the exact opposite. Hayden was a piece of WOOD in this film. Not to mention that his character was just flat. Jamie Bell's character: I was actually starting to get invested in more than the main character.

[–] bjamzilla 8 years ago

I agree. I was introduced to Jamie Bell via this movie. He is by far the best thing about it and was rather hoping for a sequel if only for him.

Wildcattin'...Wildcattin'. Pow! I'm gonna go.