MovieChat Forums > Away from Her (2007) Discussion > Ending.... go on, comment, it'll be fun

Ending.... go on, comment, it'll be fun


So what about the ending then? I was, and am, fairly in love with this movie, having seen it for the first time last night. I am nagged though, still trying to decide if I feel let down by the conclusion. I just expected something... more..... conclusive.
I think.
I felt the most emotionally demanding parts were near the start, in the subtle onset of the disease, and the first scene when she doesn't recognise him I found utterly heartbreaking... but at the end, while not quite nonplussed, I wasn't as moved as I had expected to be.
And I am also debating whether I was prerturbed by the coupling of the husband, with Aubrey's wife... I felt distanced by it or something, it diminished my empathy for the husband's character.. but then maybe that was the desired effect. i.e. He is not a saint.
Would like to hear other people's thoughts on the end,
I can't think of anything to put after that comma, but yes, I would like to hear people's thoughts on the end.

reply

Go on, I have biscuits....

reply

With my sixtieth birthday approaching I wasn't sure if I wanted to see the DVD of this film that a friend had lent me. Another friend, who is part of a book group, also told me that her group had chosen not to read the story because some of them had relations with Alzheimers and it would be too distressing. With nothing better to do I watched it last night. Although the acting was very fine I felt that the ending was totally unbelievable. A cop out so that the film could have a happy ending. Are the biscuits chocolate chip?

reply

Mm, it is quite depressing. My forgetting about this board for five months doesn´t bode too well for my mental future either. Its a very subtle exploration of Alzheimers though, maybe it would even help relatives, or be consoling in some way. They are indeed chocolate chip, although now a smidgeon stale.

reply

the ending isn't that happy. she's having a brief moment of lucidity but it's heart breaking because you know it won't last and they'll both be miserable again in a few days

reply

How else could it end? With Alzheimer's, you just fade away. That's why it's sad. No fanfare.

reply

I though it was effed up that, after Grant practically manipulates Marian into allowing Aubrey to return to Meadowlake, he comes to Fiona's room thinking he's finally giving her wha she wants Fiona doesn't remember Aubrey and instead remembers him. This movie was so sad.

Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.

reply

"I though it was effed up that, after Grant practically manipulates Marian into allowing Aubrey to return to Meadowlake, he comes to Fiona's room thinking he's finally giving her wha she wants Fiona doesn't remember Aubrey and instead remembers him. This movie was so sad. "

She did remember Aubrey, and was in pain at being reminded of him. Apparently, Grant took way too long to get Aubrey over there.

What is annoying and stupid is that the movie ends with Aubrey sitting outside the door waiting to come in. On the other hand, no good would have come from letting him in at that point. Way to go, Grant.

This movie was supposed to be about Grant's self-sacrifice for his wife's happiness, but the ending completely undermined that when Grant "gets his wife back" and leaves Audrey (and Audrey's wife, really) out to dry.

And so what that Fiona remembered Grant? Tomorrow she'll forget him again. Really she was more consistently happy with Audrey than with Grant. Aside from showing somewhat cynical gratitude that he didn't "forsake" her, she really didn't seem to like Grant that much.

I could say more, but that'd take us off-topic.

reply

Agreed.

Grant is a selfish prick, frankly.

I think the ending would have been appropriately bittersweet if Pinset played his part a bit differently. If he had conveyed some element of self-doubt rather than satisfaction with what happened.

But he didn't and that left an odd aftertaste for me. Was Polley aiming for a happy ending here? I didn't get one.

I didn't read the short story.

reply

Since Marian gave up her home in order to put Aubrey back in Meadowlake, I wondered.........was she moving in with Grant ?

Gift card?? Who hurt you?

reply

ayo let me giv u some biscuits 2 munch on
i thot dis movie was mad wack n chit

dey didnt even hav it in 3d

fsck!!!!!

reply

I need to watch it again with my full attention instead of doing other things at the same time but I do agree with the post that this is the way Alzheimer's and other forms of dementia are. The ending was unsettling and unsettled but that's the disease. I guess you can infer anything you like about the two who are left behind. Depends a lot on whose shoes you are walking in...

reply

What kind of conclusiveness though? Like where does the relationship between Grant and Marian go? What happens to Fiona? I feel like it's all a fait accompli. Fiona will continue to degenerate, and will die; it's inevitable. The movie is depressing enough without going into the endgame. It is an inconclusive conclusion, but it's kind of a nice note to end on.

reply

It's an ambiguous ending, just like that of people suffering from the degeneration, sadly.

Everybody wants to be found.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtieZvF-LUM

reply

I thought the ending was brilliant. To appreciate it, we have to exit the literal world and instead think of the movie in terms of metaphor. To me, the movie is a metaphor for "true love". We all think we know what it is, "forever", "in sickness or in health", etc. But when put to the test like Grant was, how many of us would stick with it?

People like Grant will do whatever it takes to ensure the happiness of their loved ones, even if it means stepping out of the picture, or more difficult yet: remaining in the picture but playing second fiddle. The whole film is a test for Grant to see if he'll go the distance or if, like Miriam, he'll harden his heart for his own selfish, emotional survival.

Grant's liason with Miriam was an example of what he would do for the sake of love. He didn't enjoy it. He manipulated her, and on so many ethical levels it was wrong what he did. But in terms of his prime directive, ensuring Fiona's happiness, it was necessary.

The ending shows us, even if for just a moment, that his efforts were not in vain. It's the ultimate confirmation of faith when Fiona remembers him as he was. 24 hours later, who knows if she'll sink back into her catatonic state, but the fact remains that the memories are still inside her. Think back to what the nurse Kristy says earlier, something like "Nothing can change what you once had." This is the core of Grant's faith which begins to falter when things seem hopeless. But the very end shows us that his faith & his love is justified.

I can't think of another movie that tells it in such a powerful way. True love is forever. The only question is, do you have what it takes to accept it?

reply

Your metaphors are frankly nebulous and the reading superficial.

Clearly I'm not the only one who saw Grant as a weak and selfish man who manipulated Miriam for solely his own needs.

His wife was perfectly happy with Aubrey. He stuck around not for her, but in order to get back her affection. He stuck around FOR HIMSELF.

reply

Your metaphors are frankly nebulous and the reading superficial.

Tell me what you didn't understand, and I'll explain it again using smaller words.

reply

Do you guys have any idea how hard it is to see your partner enjoying their time with someone else, leaving you in the corner, quite literally like we see in this film.

I was surprised Grant wasn't more reactive about this.

Anyway, I thought the whole 30 days no visit principle was superficial and possibly only there for the film. Are there really rules like that?I mean, considering their age, they could die within that time and it'd be longer than 30 days.

Lastly, Fiona should have never been sent there. Grant was capable of looking after her and I don't know why she was "so persistent" (the irony) of going there. What good's it gonna do for you memory if you have to meet new people and get used to new surroundings etc?

reply

I just watched the film. I enjoyed it.

Here's how I interpreted the ending: it struck me that Fiona's recognition of Grant as her husband, was meant to be interpreted as Grant's "reward" for acting selflessly in reuniting her with Aubrey. (But it was only a very transient reward because the next time they met, Fiona would likely not recognize Grant. The nurse described this "flickering" of patients' memory, once they've been moved to the second floor.)

The nurse had earlier told Grant that it was never too late to do the right thing. So I interpret the ending of the film as showing that Grant is rewarded for, finally, doing the right thing.

reply

I really enjoyed the ending. Grant thought he was doing the right thing and maybe getting something positive in return...then you could see the reality in his eyes by a brief flicker of the past. It was very moving indeed.

reply