MovieChat Forums > The Princess and the Frog (2009) Discussion > Why’d it Bomb? The Princess and the Frog...

Why’d it Bomb? The Princess and the Frog (2009)


https://lebeauleblog.com/2017/03/21/whyd-it-bomb-the-princess-and-the-frog-2009/

4. People thought the movie was racist

While I doubt racists themselves affected the movie’s box office gross, there were rumors about the movie that turned some people off and made them think it was racist. Some of these things were changed (like Tiana was changed from a chamber maid to a waitress) but, even when the movie’s trailers started airing, there were still things that people found to be problematic of the movie, like the fact that the first Black Disney Princess spends most of the movie being a frog. It didn’t help that many Disney movies in the past have had racial stereotypes in them. In their defense, most of those movies happened back when racial stereotyping was the norm but, at least back then, people still gave Disney a hard time for it.

3. Maybe Disney didn’t do enough to promote the movie

If you read the article above, you’d think this movie had a lot of promotion. Yet, I have to be honest, I don’t remember that many commercials for it airing on TV. Oprah, who was in the movie, didn’t even promote it on her show. And many audience members probably find out what movies are coming out through either trailers or commercials. As a result, some people might’ve not even known there was a new Disney Princess movie out. It probably didn’t help that it was released during the Christmas season, when a lot of successful movies were coming out, which meant that it couldn’t help but get lost in the shuffle.

2. Children have become too used to animated movies being comedies

In my article about Epic, I said that animated comedies seem to sell better nowadays than other types of animated movies. And that is pretty much true. I think it has to do with the fact that it’s been a decade since Shrek and, in that time, many studios have tried to ape Shrek’s success by making all of their animated movies comedies. As a result, I think that many children have grown up with more goofy animated movies and expect every animated movie to be a joke fest like Shrek was. Yet The Princess and the Frog was not only trying to be like an old fashioned animated movie but it was promoted as such.

However, seeing as kids have grown up with comedic animated films, they probably weren’t interested in seeing something that was more akin to The Little Mermaid or Beauty and the Beast and, therefore, they stayed away.

1. It came out around the same time as Avatar, a movie praised for it’s technological advancements

The Princess and the Frog was an attempt by Disney to bring back 2D animation. Unfortunately, at the same time, Avatar came out, which was being praised by people for making special effects look even more realistic than before. Having The Princess and the Frog come out around the same time as Avatar might’ve made it look more old fashioned and out of date by comparison, which might’ve turned many people off and caused them to flock to Avatar instead, where they could oogle at how cool the Na’vi looked and how far we’ve come in terms of special effects.

These are all possible reasons the movie’s box office intake was…mediocre to say the least. Could it also be that people just didn’t want to see a 2D animated movie in 2009? Maybe. Although, who knows, in a less busy time, the movie might’ve done better, even in 2009. But we’ll never know and, unfortunately, it did not revive 2D animation for Disney like everyone thought it would.

reply

I remember seeing this in the theater and really liking it. The songs were catchy, the story was great and I really liked how they used old school animation. I really miss that in movies.

reply

On number 2: I think the exact opposite was partly true!:
It was a spoof when folks wanted the film to be more heartfelt (compare with, say, 1941's Dumbo's "Baby Mine" musical number or 2013's "Frozen"'s "Let it Go"..not that a Disney film shouldn'yt HAVE humor, but it came across as another spoof a la Alladin or Roger Rabbit..btw I astayed away..

Btw HollyGoLightly: I love your username! :-)

reply

For one thing, the animation style and even some characters (the alligator) seemed to be stolen right out of a Don Bluth film. Second the film had a poor plot, among the poorest I have ever seen. It seemed very ''quick'' in how the writers put it together and then derive from other films (and it was very derivative indeed).

Why do I get the feeling it was just made to add to add a black princess to the Disney princess merchandises?

reply

"Why do I get the feeling it was just made to add to add a black princess to the Disney princess merchandises? "

YA THINK?

But seriously, it's just not that good a film. It doesn't work as a comedy, an adventure, a romance, or a fantasy, or a heartfelt drama... in fact by 2009 Pixar was producing all those things on a regular basis and this seemed pallid by comparison. That was one of the reasons it failed that nobody's mentioned yet, the competition from Pixar. I mean, compare this to "Wall-E", "Up", or even the kid films like "Toy Story". They're just better movies.

reply

The animation was nice, but the rest was crap. They also ruined the fairy tale. Tangled's "twist" stayed close to the heart of the story at least.

reply

The reason why The Princess And The Frog wasn't successful for Disney was because they had released it around the big major holidays "Thanksgiving and Christmas" and as you know when Disney releases films around the holidays it's an excuse to make the merchandise sell during Christmas and with The Princess And The Frog Disney hoped to do just that. But the big major problem with the movie was Disney had done many changes to the movie like changing Tiana's name from Maddy to Tiana and adding characters that really didn't help the movie at all like Lawrence Violet Sammy and Georgia and making Tiana a waitress rather than a maid. I think Disney copied the video game Diner Dash and decided to cash in on the game's popularity by making Tiana a waitress. The other thing that was wrong was they could've gotten Tiana a boyfriend who looked like Wayne Brady and they could've given him a name like Quentin or Lafayette because although Prince Naveen is handsome and cute I felt that Prince Naveen was simply put in the movie so that he could put a crush factor in the movie. Another final thing is that although Disney had high hopes for The Princess And The Frog there was no other promotion for the movie other than toys such as dolls and plush frogs and I can predict that the same thing that happened to The Princess And The Frog will happen to Onward and Soul. But adding Princess Tiana to the Disney Princess line was Disney's main point for doing this film

reply